ReviewJournal of orthopaedic translation2022
Current strategies for enhancement of the bioactivity of artificial ligaments: A mini-review.
Review in Journal of orthopaedic translation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Artificial ligaments in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Coating strategies for PET-based materials.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2025Review
- Nanostructured Coatings Based on Graphene Oxide for the Management of Periprosthetic Infections.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Silver/Graphene Oxide Nanostructured Coatings for Modulating the Microbial Susceptibility of Fixation Devices Used in Knee Surgery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Elastin is responsible for the rigidity of the ligament under shear and rotational stress: a mathematical simulation study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction calls for artificial ligaments with better bioactivity, however systematic reviews regarding bioactivity enhancement strategies, technologies, and perspectives of artificial ligaments have been rarely found. Methods: Research papers, reviews, and clinical reports related to artificial ligaments were searched and summarized the current status and research trends of artificial ligaments through a systematic analysis. Results: Having experienced ups and downs since the very first record of clinical application, artificial ligaments differing in material, and fabrication methods have been reported with different clinical performances. Various manufacturing technologies have developed and realized scaffold- and cell-based strategies. Despite encouraging Conclusion: As the demand for ACL reconstruction dramatically increases, novel artificial ligaments with better osteoinductivity and mechanical performance are promising. The translational potential of this article: To develop novel artificial ligaments simultaneously possessing excellent osteoinductivity and satisfactory mechanical performance, it is important to grab a glance at recent research advances. This systematic analysis provides researchers and clinicians with comprehensive and comparable information on artificial ligaments, thus being of clinical translational significance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.