Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36263380›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic translation2022

A novel image-based machine learning model with superior accuracy and predictability for knee arthroplasty loosening detection and clinical decision making.

Lawrence Chun Man Lau, Elvis Chun Sing Chui, Gene Chi Wai Man, Ye Xin, Kevin Ki Wai Ho, Kyle Ka Kwan Mak, Michael Tim Yun Ong, Sheung Wai Law, Wing Hoi Cheung, Patrick Shu Hang Yung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic translation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Automation in tibial implant loosening detection using deep-learning segmentation.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lawrence Chun Man LauDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, The Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Elvis Chun Sing ChuiDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, The Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Gene Chi Wai ManDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, The Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Ye XinDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, The Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Kevin Ki Wai HoDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, The Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Kyle Ka Kwan MakDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, The Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Michael Tim Yun OngDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, The Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Sheung Wai LawDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, The Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Wing Hoi CheungDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, The Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Patrick Shu Hang YungDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, The Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Loosening is the leading cause of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) revision. This is a heavy burden toward the healthcare system owing to the difficulty in diagnosis and complications occurring from the delay management. Based on automatic analytical model building, machine learning, may potentially help to automatically recognize the risk of loosening based on radiographs alone. The aim of this study was to build an image-based machine-learning model for detecting TKA loosening. Methods: Image-based machine-learning model was developed based on ImageNet, Xception model and a TKA patient X-ray image dataset. Based on a dataset with TKA patient clinical parameters, another system was then created for developing the clinical-information-based machine learning model with random forest classifier. In addition, the Xception Model was pre-trained on the ImageNet database with python and TensorFlow deep learning library for the prediction of loosening. Class activation maps were also used to interpret the prediction decision made by model. Two senior orthopaedic specialists were invited to assess loosening from X-ray images for 3 attempts in setting up comparison benchmark. Result: In the image-based machine learning loosening model, the precision rate and recall rate were 0.92 and 0.96, respectively. While for the accuracy rate, 96.3% for visualization classification was observed. However, the addition of clinical-information-based model, with precision rate of 0.71 and recall rate of 0.20, did not further showed improvement on the accuracy. Moreover, as class activation maps showed corresponding signals over bone-implant interface that is loosened radiographically, this confirms that the current model utilized a similar image recognition pattern as that of inspection by clinical specialists. Conclusion: The image-based machine learning model developed demonstrated high accuracy and predictability of knee arthroplasty loosening. And the class activation heatmap matched well with the radiographic features used clinically to detect loosening, which highlighting its potential role in assisting clinicians in their daily practice. However, addition of clinical-information-based machine-learning model did not offer further improvement in detection. As far as we know, this is the first report of pure image-based machine learning model with high detection accuracy. Importantly, this is also the first model to show relevant class activation heatmap corresponding to loosening location. Translational potential: The finding in this study indicated image-based machine learning model can detect knee arthroplasty loosening with high accuracy and predictability, which the class activation heatmap can potentially assist surgeons to identify the sites of loosening.

Indexed as

AI, Artificial IntelligenceArtificial intelligenceCNN, Convolutional Neural NetworklooseningMachine learningPredictive modelingROC, Receiver Operating CharacteristicTKA, Total Knee ArthroplastyTotal knee arthroplastyXception model

Identifiers

PMID36263380
PMCPMC9562957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.