Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36263362›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2022

Motion artifacts removal and evaluation techniques for functional near-infrared spectroscopy signals: A review.

Ruisen Huang, Keum-Shik Hong, Dalin Yang, Guanghao Huang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Schizophrenia Research: Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. From lab to life: challenges and perspectives of fNIRS for haemodynamic-based neurofeedback in real-world environments.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ruisen HuangSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan, South Korea.
Keum-Shik HongSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan, South Korea.
Dalin YangMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Guanghao HuangInstitute for Future, School of Automation, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the emergence of an increasing number of functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) devices, the significant deterioration in measurement caused by motion artifacts has become an essential research topic for fNIRS applications. However, a high requirement for mathematics and programming limits the number of related researches. Therefore, here we provide the first comprehensive review for motion artifact removal in fNIRS aiming to (i) summarize the latest achievements, (ii) present the significant solutions and evaluation metrics from the perspective of application and reproduction, and (iii) predict future topics in the field. The present review synthesizes information from fifty-one journal articles (screened according to three criteria). Three hardware-based solutions and nine algorithmic solutions are summarized, and their application requirements (compatible signal types, the availability for online applications, and limitations) and extensions are discussed. Five metrics for noise suppression and two metrics for signal distortion were synthesized to evaluate the motion artifact removal methods. Moreover, we highlight three deficiencies in the existing research: (i) The balance between the use of auxiliary hardware and that of an algorithmic solution is not clarified; (ii) few studies mention the filtering delay of the solutions, and (iii) the robustness and stability of the solution under extreme application conditions are not discussed.

Indexed as

filtering techniquesfunctional near-infrared spectroscopyhemodynamic responsemotion artifacts removalnoise suppressionsignal-to-noise ratio

Identifiers

PMID36263362
PMCPMC9576156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.