ArticleJournal of craniovertebral junction & spine
Magnetic resonance imaging anatomy of the craniovertebral ligaments: A radiological study with confirmatory dissection.
Article in Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Descriptions of the radiological appearance of the craniovertebral ligaments often lack detail. This study aimed to provide an accurate description of the morphology and radiological appearance of the alar and cruciform ligaments with confirmation of findings by fine dissection. Materials and Methods: Six embalmed human cadaveric specimens were reduced to an osseoligamentous arrangement spanning the C2/3 disc to the occiput. Specimens were imaged on a 4.6T Bruker magnetic resonance (MR) system using a 3D RARE multiple SE sequence with acquisition time 18 h 24 min. Acquired images were viewed in three planes, and detailed descriptions and morphometric measurement of the ligaments were obtained. Specimens were then examined and described using fine dissection. Direct comparison of the descriptions of each method was undertaken. Results: From imaging, detailed features of all alar ligaments could be identified in all specimens. Consistency in shape, orientation, and attachments is described. Attachment to the medial aspect of the atlantooccipital joints was evident in all specimens. Five of six alar ligament pairs contained fibers that traversed the dens without attachment. Ascending cruciform ligaments could be clearly identified in four of six specimens. No descending cruciform ligaments could be clearly delineated. Detailed features of the transverse ligaments could be identified and described in all planes. Dissection findings were mostly consistent with descriptions obtained from MR images. Conclusion: 4.6T MR images provide accurate detail of the structure, dimensions, and attachments of the craniovertebral ligaments. The morphology of the craniovertebral ligaments assessed radiologically was consistent with findings on gross dissection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.