Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36263327›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2022

Enhanced anti-cancer effects of oestrogen and progesterone co-therapy against colorectal cancer in males.

Amani A Mahbub, Akhmed Aslam, Mohamed E Elzubier, Mohamed El-Boshy, Abdelghany H Abdelghany, Jawwad Ahmad, Shakir Idris, Riyad Almaimani, Aiman Alsaegh, Mahmoud Zaki El-Readi and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. 17β-estradiol in colorectal cancer: friend or foe?Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Amani A MahbubLaboratory Medicine Department, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Akhmed AslamLaboratory Medicine Department, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamed E ElzubierDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamed El-BoshyLaboratory Medicine Department, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Abdelghany H AbdelghanyLaboratory Medicine Department, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Jawwad AhmadLaboratory Medicine Department, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Shakir IdrisLaboratory Medicine Department, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Riyad AlmaimaniDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Aiman AlsaeghLaboratory Medicine Department, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Mahmoud Zaki El-ReadiDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed A BaghdadiResearch Centre, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Bassem RefaatLaboratory Medicine Department, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although ovarian sex steroids could have protective roles against colorectal cancer (CRC) in women, little is currently known about their potential anti-tumorigenic effects in men. Hence, this study measured the therapeutic effects of 17β-oestradiol (E2) and/or progesterone (P4) against azoxymethane-induced CRC in male mice that were divided into (n = 10 mice/group): negative (NC) and positive (PC) controls, E2 (580 µg/Kg/day; five times/week) and P4 (2.9 mg/Kg/day; five times/week) monotherapies, and concurrent (EP) and sequential (E/P) co-therapy groups. Both hormones were injected intraperitoneally to the designated groups for four consecutive weeks. Similar treatment protocols with E2 (10 nM) and/or P4 (20 nM) were also used in the SW480 and SW620 human male CRC cell lines. The PC group showed abundant colonic tumours alongside increased colonic tissue testosterone levels and androgen (AR) and oestrogen (ERα) receptors, whereas E2 and P4 levels with ERβ and progesterone receptor (PGR) decreased significantly compared with the NC group. E2 and P4 monotherapies equally increased ERβ/PGR with p21/Cytochrome-C/Caspase-3, reduced testosterone levels, inhibited ERα/AR and CCND1/survivin and promoted apoptosis relative to the PC group. Both co-therapy protocols also revealed better anti-cancer effects with enhanced modulation of colonic sex steroid hormones and their receptors, with E/P the most prominent protocol.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsProstatic NeoplasmsAndrogen AntagonistsAndrogensAnimalsAzoxymethaneCaspase 3CytochromesEstradiolEstrogen Receptor alphaEstrogen Receptor betaEstrogensGonadal Steroid HormonesHumansMaleMiceAndrogen AntagonistsAndrogensAzoxymethaneCaspase 3CytochromesEstradiolEstrogen Receptor alphaEstrogen Receptor betaEstrogensGonadal Steroid HormonesProgesteroneReceptors, ProgesteroneRNA, MessengerSurvivinTestosteroneandrogen receptorapoptosiscell cycleoestrogen receptorprogesterone receptortestosterone

Identifiers

PMID36263327
PMCPMC9574067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.