Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36263311›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2022

Changes in the Cross-Sectional Profile of Treated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Within 2 Years After Surgery.

Danilo Menghini, Shankar G Kaushal, Sean W Flannery, Kirsten Ecklund, BEAR Trial Team, Martha M Murray, Braden C Fleming, Ata M Kiapour, Benedikt Proffen, Nicholas Sant and 8 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02664545 (A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial Evaluating the Non-Inferiority of Bridge-Enhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02664545 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial Evaluating the Non-Inferiority of Bridge-Enhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair (BEAR) to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With an Autologous Tendon Graft (ACLR)

TypeinterventionalSponsorMiach OrthopaedicsRan2016 to 2028Enrolled100ConditionsAnterior Cruciate Ligament TearArmsBEAR Scaffold, Tendon Graft
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Preclinical tendon and ligament models: Beyond the 3Rs (replacement, reduction, and refinement) to 5W1H (why, who, what, where, when, how).Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Danilo MenghiniInvestigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Shankar G KaushalInvestigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Sean W FlanneryInvestigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Kirsten EcklundInvestigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
BEAR Trial Team
Martha M MurrayInvestigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Braden C FlemingInvestigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ata M KiapourInvestigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Benedikt ProffenInvestigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Nicholas SantInvestigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Gabriela PortillaInvestigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ryan SanbornInvestigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Christina FreibergerInvestigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Rachael HendersonInvestigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Samuel BarnettInvestigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Yi-Meng YenInvestigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Dennis E KramerInvestigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Lyle J MicheliInvestigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The cross-sectional area (CSA) of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and reconstructed graft has direct implications on its strength and knee function. Little is known regarding how the CSA changes along the ligament length and how those changes vary between treated and native ligaments over time. Hypothesis: It was hypothesized that (1) the CSA of reconstructed ACLs and restored ACLs via bridge-enhanced ACL restoration (BEAR) is heterogeneous along the length. (2) Differences in CSA between treated and native ACLs decrease over time. (3) CSA of the surgically treated ACLs is correlated significantly with body size (ie, height, weight, body mass index) and knee size (ie, bicondylar and notch width). Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Magnetic resonance imaging scans of treated and contralateral knees of 98 patients (n = 33 ACL reconstruction, 65 BEAR) at 6, 12, and 24 months post-operation were used to measure the ligament CSA at 1% increments along the ACL length (tibial insertion, 0%; femoral insertion, 100%). Statistical parametric mapping was used to evaluate the differences in CSA between 6 and 24 months. Correlations between body and knee size and treated ligament CSA along its length were also assessed. Results: Hamstring autografts had larger CSAs than native ACLs at all time points ( Conclusion: Surgically treated ACLs remodel continuously within the first 2 years after surgery, leading to ligaments/grafts with heterogeneous CSAs along the length, similar to the native ACL. While reconstructed ACLs remained significantly larger, the restored ACL had a CSA profile comparable with that of the contralateral native ACL. In addition to size and morphology differences, there were fundamental differences in factors contributing to CSA profile between the ACL reconstruction and BEAR procedures. Registration: NCT02664545 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Indexed as

ACLACL reconstructionbridge-enhanced ACL restorationcross-sectional area

Identifiers

PMID36263311
PMCPMC9575446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.