ArticleSSM - population health2022
Machine learning prediction of suicidal ideation, planning, and attempt among Korean adults: A population-based study.
Article in SSM - population health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence and risk factors of suicidal ideation amongst unaccompanied young refugees: a machine learning approach.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2026Article
- A machine learning approach for predicting suicidal ideation among family members of persons with disabilities: a cross-sectional study in the Republic of Korea.Osong public health and research perspectives · 2025Article
- "I Will Die by My Own Hand": Understanding the Development of Suicide Capability in the Narratives of Individuals Who Have Attempted Suicide.Qualitative health research · 2025Article
- Behavioral and social predictors of suicidal ideation and attempts among adolescents and young adults.PLOS mental health · 2025Article
- Prediction of Suicidal Thoughts and Suicide Attempts in People Who Gamble Based on Biological-Psychological-Social Variables: A Machine Learning Study.The Psychiatric quarterly · 2024Article
- Development of an AI-Based Suicide Ideation Prediction Model for People with Disabilities.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Evaluating the clinical utility of an easily applicable prediction model of suicide attempts, newly developed and validated with a general community sample of adults.BMC psychiatry · 2024Article
- Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Suicidality in Adolescents With Allergic Rhinitis: Derivation and Validation in 2 Independent Nationwide Cohorts.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Article
- Predicting suicidal behavior in individuals with depression over 50 years of age: Evidence from the UK biobank.Digital healthArticle
- Suicidal ideation after stroke: why standardized screening is essential for community-based prediction models.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Suicide remains the leading cause of premature death in South Korea. This study aims to develop machine learning algorithms for screening Korean adults at risk for suicidal ideation and suicide planning or attempt. Methods: Two sets of balanced data for Korean adults aged 19-64 years were drawn from the 2012-2019 waves of the Korea Welfare Panel Study using the random down-sampling method ( Results: All four algorithms demonstrated satisfactory classification performance in predicting suicidal ideation (sensitivity 0.808-0.853, accuracy 0.843-0.863) and suicide planning or attempt (sensitivity 0.814-0.861, accuracy 0.864-0.884). Extreme gradient boosting was the best-performing algorithm for predicting both suicidal outcomes. The most important predictors were depressive symptoms, self-esteem, income, consumption, and life satisfaction. The algorithms trained with the top two predictors, depressive symptoms and self-esteem, showed comparable classification performance in predicting suicidal ideation (sensitivity 0.801-0.839, accuracy 0.841-0.846) and suicide planning or attempt (sensitivity 0.814-0.837, accuracy 0.874-0.884). Limitations: Suicidal ideation and behaviors may be under-reported due to social desirability bias. Causality is not established. Discussion: More than 80% of individuals at risk for suicidal ideation and suicide planning or attempt could be predicted by a number of mental and socioeconomic characteristics of respondents. This finding suggests the potential of developing a quick screening tool based on the known risk factors and applying it to primary care or community settings for early intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.