ArticleHSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery2022
Posterior Approach With Small Incision Is a Safe Alternative to Anterior Approach for Hamstring Autograft Harvest in Adolescents.
Article in HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Posteromedial Approach for Harvesting Hamstring Autografts Results in Fewer Incidents of Saphenous Nerve Injury Compared to the Conventional Anteromedial Approach: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinics in orthopedic surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Comparison of Medial Hamstring Length Between Harvesting Methods Using Anterior and Posterior Approaches.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There are potential drawbacks and complications associated with using the anterior approach to harvest the hamstring tendon as an autograft source for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction. A posterior harvest technique has been described as an alternative to an anterior approach in skeletally mature patients. The 2 approaches have not been compared in adolescents. Purpose: We sought to compare the incision size and harvested tendon length produced by anterior and posterior hamstring harvest techniques in an adolescent population. Methods: After obtaining consent, we prospectively collected data on a consecutive series of 115 adolescents undergoing ACL or MPFL reconstruction, including the length of the incision and of the harvested hamstring tendon. Demographic information including age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) was collected at the time of surgery. Results: The mean age at the time of surgery was 14.3 ± 1.8 years (range: 9-21 years), and 43% (N = 50) of participants were male. Of the 115 hamstring autografts, 26 were harvested anteriorly and 89 were harvested posteriorly. Neither mean semitendinosus length nor mean gracilis length was significantly different when harvested anteriorly versus posteriorly. The posterior harvest group had a mean incision length that was significantly smaller than that of the anterior harvest group. No iatrogenic nerve injuries or neurovascular complications were observed in either group. Conclusion: A posterior incision for hamstring autograft harvest provided an alternative approach in adolescents, which resulted in a 20% smaller incision than an anterior approach. For procedures such as MPFL reconstruction that do not require concomitant anteromedial work, posterior hamstring harvest may be used to improve cosmesis while producing viable hamstring autograft tissue for surgical reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.