ArticleInternational journal of heart failure2021
Rationale and Study Design of the Withdrawal of Spironolactone for Heart Failure with Improved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.
Article in International journal of heart failure, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Withdrawal of Spironolactone for Heart Failure With Improved Ejection Fraction: An Open-Label, Pilot, Randomized Controlled Trial (With-HF Trial).Korean circulation journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is unclear if guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) should be maintained in patients who have heart failure (HF) with improved ejection fraction (HFiEF). Of the medications recommended for HF, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) is associated with heterogeneous results and considerable adverse events. We wish to evaluate whether MRA withdrawal is safe or associated with deterioration of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We will select 60 patients with HFiEF of a New York Heart Association functional class I-II who are receiving GDMT and randomize them in a 1:1 fashion into 2 groups: one that will continue treatment and one that will have spironolactone administration withdrawn. All patients will receive standard medical therapy other than MRA. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients with declining LVEF ≥10%. Secondary outcomes include a change in LVEF, the estimated glomerular filtration rate, B-type natriuretic peptide or N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels, and adverse clinical events, including death, re-hospitalization, or an emergency department visit for HF. This trial will provide important evidence on whether MRA in addition to other standard therapy, should be maintained or withdrawn in patients with HFiEF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.