ArticleScanning2022
Application of CT Multimodal Images in Rehabilitation Monitoring of Long-Distance Running.
Article in Scanning, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-12-06Compromised Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to monitor the rehabilitation of athletes injured in long-distance running, the author proposes a method for rehabilitation monitoring of long-distance running based on CT multimodal images. This method combines the latest multimodal image technology, integrates multimodal technology into CT images to improve the accuracy, performs image segmentation on CT multimodal images through medical segmentation methods, and analyzes the segmented images; finally, it can achieve the effect of rehabilitation treatment for athletes in long-distance running. Experimental results show that the total time taken by the authors' method is 10.9 hours, with an average time of 8 seconds, which is much shorter than the other two control methods. In conclusion, the authors' method allows for better rehabilitation monitoring of long-distance running sports injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.