Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36263062›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2022

COVID19 Diagnosis Using Chest X-rays and Transfer Learning.

Jonathan Stubblefield, Jason Causey, Dakota Dale, Jake Qualls, Emily Bellis, Jennifer Fowler, Karl Walker, Xiuzhen Huang

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan StubblefieldArkansas AI-Campus, Molecular Biosciences, Arkansas State University, Jonesboro, AR, USA.
Jason CauseyArkansas AI-Campus, Computer Science, Arkansas State University, Jonesboro, AR, USA.
Dakota DaleArkansas AI-Campus, Computer Science, University of Arkansas at Fayetteville, AR, USA.
Jake QuallsArkansas AI-Campus, Computer Science, Arkansas State University, Jonesboro, AR, USA.
Emily BellisArkansas AI-Campus, Computer Science, Arkansas State University, Jonesboro, AR, USA.
Jennifer FowlerArkansas AI-Campus, Molecular Biosciences, Arkansas State University, Jonesboro, AR, USA.
Karl WalkerArkansas AI-Campus, Computer Science & Math University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff, AR, USA.
Xiuzhen HuangArkansas AI-Campus, Arkansas State University, Dept. of Computational Biomedicine, Cedars Sinai Medical Center.
Arkansas State University · USUniversity of Arkansas at Fayetteville · USUniversity of Arkansas at Pine Bluff · US

Funding

Understanding Hesitant AdoptersP20GM103429 · NIGMS · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI Lawrence E Cornett, JERRY WARE · 2012 to 2026
$60.9M
Biomedical Computing and Informatics Strategies for Precision MedicineR01LM012601 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HUANG, XIUZHEN, MOORE, JASON H. · 2017 to 2020
$1.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103429NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012601
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A pandemic of respiratory illnesses from a novel coronavirus known as Sars-CoV-2 has swept across the globe since December of 2019. This is calling upon the research community including medical imaging to provide effective tools for use in combating this virus. Research in biomedical imaging of viral patients is already very active with machine learning models being created for diagnosing Sars-CoV-2 infections in patients using CT scans and chest x-rays. We aim to build upon this research. Here we used a transfer-learning approach to develop models capable of diagnosing COVID19 from chest x-ray. For this work we compiled a dataset of 112120 negative images from the Chest X-Ray 14 and 2725 positive images from public repositories. We tested multiple models, including logistic regression and random forest and XGBoost with and without principal components analysis, using five-fold cross-validation to evaluate recall, precision, and f1-score. These models were compared to a pre-trained deep-learning model for evaluating chest x-rays called COVID-Net. Our best model was XGBoost with principal components with a recall, precision, and f1-score of 0.692, 0.960, 0.804 respectively. This model greatly outperformed COVID-Net which scored 0.987, 0.025, 0.048. This model, with its high precision and reasonable sensitivity, would be most useful as "rule-in" test for COVID19. Though it outperforms some chemical assays in sensitivity, this model should be studied in patients who would not ordinarily receive a chest x-ray before being used for screening.

Indexed as

Chest X-RayCOVID19Machine LearningMedical ImagingTransfer Learning

Identifiers

PMID36263062
PMCPMC9580378
OpenAlexW4304471262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.