ArticleContrast media & molecular imaging2022
Clinical Value of PET.CT Based on Big Data in Colorectal and Peritoneal Metastatic Cancer.
Article in Contrast media & molecular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Laparoscopic surgery is associated with increased risk of postoperative peritoneal metastases in T4 colon cancer: a propensity score analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Article
- Retracted: Clinical Value of PET.CT Based on Big Data in Colorectal and Peritoneal Metastatic Cancer.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-11-29Compromised Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study focuses on the evaluation of the clinical utility of PET-CT imaging in peritoneal metastases and colorectal cancer. One hundred patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases, who underwent whole-body PET-CT imaging from January 2015 to December 2019, were selected as the experimental group, and 20 healthy individuals were selected as the control group. The SUVmax of the two groups of patients was 5.73 ± 3.84 and 2.70 ± 2.32, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant. The SUVmax AUC was 0.720, and the AUC of serum AFP, CEA, CA125, and CA199 were 0.596, 0.677, 0.642, and 0.696, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.