Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36262974›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2022

Antioxidant and Anticancer Potentials of the Olive and Sesame Mixture against Dimethylhydrazine-Induced Colorectal Cancer in Wistar Rats.

Amirhasan Valaei, Fatemeh Azadeh, Seyedeh Talayeh Mostafavi Niaki, Alireza Salehi, Maede Shakib Khoob, Seyed Hesam Odin Mirebrahimi, Sohrab Kazemi, Seyed Mohammad Hosseini

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Neuroprotective Effects ofNeurology research international · 2023
    Article
  8. Effect ofEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amirhasan ValaeiDepartment of Pathology, Babol Branch, Islamic Azad University, Babol, Iran.
Fatemeh AzadehDepartment of Pathology, Babol Branch, Islamic Azad University, Babol, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6862-8249
Seyedeh Talayeh Mostafavi NiakiDepartment of Pathology, Babol Branch, Islamic Azad University, Babol, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5289-2934
Alireza SalehiDepartment of Pathology, Babol Branch, Islamic Azad University, Babol, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3764-8113
Maede Shakib KhoobDepartment of Pathology, Babol Branch, Islamic Azad University, Babol, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9034-0778
Seyed Hesam Odin MirebrahimiDepartment of Pathology, Babol Branch, Islamic Azad University, Babol, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7572-5976
Sohrab KazemiCellular and Molecular Biology Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8068-5745
Seyed Mohammad HosseiniDepartment of Pathology, Babol Branch, Islamic Azad University, Babol, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6015-3832
Islamic Azad University, BabolBabol University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide, and natural agents have shown some promise in fighting it. Thus, the present study tried to evaluate the healing potential of an equal combination of olive and sesame extract (MOS) against the colorectal cancerous lesions that were induced by dimethylhydrazine (DMH) in male rats and also compare the anticarcinogenic potential of the MOS and vitamin E with each other. Therefore, the mixture of equal olive and sesame extract (MOS) was used as the main treatment, alongside vitamin E as a parallel treatment. This study examined the red blood cell (RBC) and white blood cell (WBC) levels, biochemical indices, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), C-reactive protein (CRP), total protein (TP), creatine kinase (CPK), albumin, and the colon tissue pathology, as well as the level of protein expression of the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC), proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF). Also, the tissue stress markers including total antioxidant capacity (TAC), malondialdehyde (MDA), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) were analyzed. Overall, the results represented a significant reduction in the congestion, mitotic index, inflammation, and cell destruction in the MOS group compared to the DMH group. In terms of the oxidative stress level, a significant increase was observed in the DMH group in comparison with the DMH-MOS group (

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsOleaSesamum1,2-DimethylhydrazineAnimalsAntioxidantsCarcinoembryonic AntigenC-Reactive ProteinCreatine KinaseDimethylhydrazinesLactate DehydrogenasesMaleMalondialdehydePlatelet-Derived Growth FactorProliferating Cell Nuclear AntigenRats1,2-DimethylhydrazineAntioxidantsCarcinoembryonic AntigenC-Reactive ProteinCreatine KinasedimazineDimethylhydrazinesLactate DehydrogenasesMalondialdehydePlatelet-Derived Growth FactorProliferating Cell Nuclear AntigenSuperoxide DismutaseVitamin E

Identifiers

PMID36262974
PMCPMC9576397
OpenAlexW4304128506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.