Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36262924›Full record

ArticleHealth SA = SA Gesondheid2022

Traditional Chinese medicine to improve rural health in South Africa: A case study for Gauteng.

Zijing Hu, Roy Venketsamy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health SA = SA Gesondheid, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zijing HuDepartment of Complementary Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9752-4163
Roy VenketsamyDepartment of Early Childhood Education, Faculty of Education, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3594-527X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Rural health is a global crisis across different continents. Most of Africa is predominantly rural and is experiencing financial constraints. Medical support and supplies are a dire need in rural Africa. An alternative option to support the rural population is through traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). Studies have highlighted the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of Chinese medicine in improving health. Aim: This article aims to investigate how rural health can be improved through alternative medicine options, focusing primarily on TCM. Setting: An identified TCM practice in Gauteng province was selected as the research setting. Methods: This study adopted a qualitative case study design to explore 10 participants' views on TCM to improve rural health. The health belief model was used as a theoretical framework, and thematic analysis was used for this study. Results: Findings revealed that most participants accepted TCM as an alternative medical health care option as it resonated with African herbal medicine. Participants agreed that TCM is cheaper and has no side effects. Conclusion: There is a lack of appropriate medical service providers in most rural areas, and often, people depend on traditional medicines as a quick remedy. As TCM is cost-effective and has proven to treat numerous ailments successfully, it is recommended that it be further explored as a health care option available to rural populations. Contribution: This was the first study on South African patients' views on TCM in the South African context.

Indexed as

Africansalternative medicinerural healthtraditional Chinese medicine

Identifiers

PMID36262924
PMCPMC9575335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.