Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36262829›Full record

ArticleSA journal of radiology2022

Radiation induced cataracts in interventionalists occupationally exposed to ionising radiation.

André Rose, William I D Rae, Margaret A Sweetlove, Lumko Ngetu, Mohamed A Benadjaoud, Wayne Marais

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SA journal of radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Occupational exposures and age-related cataract: A review.Archives of environmental & occupational health · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

André RoseCenter for Health Systems Research and Development, Faculty of Humanities, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2119-0117
William I D RaePrince of Wales Hospital, Faculty of Medical Imaging, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3866-8562
Margaret A SweetloveDepartment of Medical Physics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8997-4183
Lumko NgetuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Health, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4658-0605
Mohamed A BenadjaoudInstitute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN), Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9895-6654
Wayne MaraisDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Health, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1704-3659

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Occupational exposure to ionising radiation may have detrimental health effects. Longer and more complex fluoroscopic procedures have placed interventionalists at increased occupational health risks especially for developing cataracts in the radiosensitive lenses of the eyes. Objectives: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of occupational related cataracts and describe the risk factors for cataracts in occupationally exposed interventionalists compared with unexposed doctors. Method: A cross-sectional study using multiple methods. A survey was conducted. The radiation workload was determined based on a self-administered questionnaire and dose area product values determined in previous studies. Both groups had slit lamp examinations. The data were analysed analytically using R software version 9.3. Results: The study included 98 interventionalists. The combined prevalence of posterior sub-capsular (PSC) and cortical cataracts was 18.8% in the exposed and 13.9% in the unexposed group. The prevalence of PSC cataracts in the exposed group was 5.9% and 2.8% in the unexposed group, with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58; 8.61). Posterior sub-capsular cataracts were more common in the left eye. The increase in cataracts was not statistically significant in the exposed group but is of clinical significance. Conclusion: The findings are important as they highlight the need for greater vigilance for protecting the radiation healthcare workforce in a developing country setting. Contribution: The research is the first of its kind in South Africa and Africa and contributes to determining the prevalence in this highly skilled and occupationally vulnerable group.

Indexed as

interventionalistsinterventional radiologyionising radiationradiation cataractsradiation protection

Identifiers

PMID36262829
PMCPMC9575381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.