Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36262791›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X2022

Elective induction of labour and expectant management in late-term pregnancy: A prospective cohort study alongside the INDEX randomised controlled trial.

Aafke Bruinsma, Judit Kj Keulen, Joep C Kortekaas, Jeroen van Dillen, Ruben G Duijnhoven, Patrick Mm Bossuyt, Anton H van Kaam, Joris Am van der Post, Ben W Mol, Esteriek de Miranda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Aafke BruinsmaAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Judit Kj KeulenAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Joep C KortekaasElkerliek Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Wesselmanlaan 25, Helmond, the Netherlands.
Jeroen van DillenRadboud University Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Ruben G DuijnhovenAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Patrick Mm BossuytAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Epidemiology & Data Science, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Anton H van KaamAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Emma, Children's hospital, Department of Neonatology, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Joris Am van der PostAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ben W MolMonash University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Esteriek de MirandaAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To assess adverse perinatal outcomes and caesarean section of low-risk women receiving elective induction of labour at 41 weeks or expectant management until 42 weeks according to their preferred and actual management strategy. Design: Multicentre prospective cohort study alongside RCT. Setting: 90 midwifery practices and 12 hospitals in the Netherlands. Population: 3642 low-risk women with uncomplicated singleton late-term pregnancy. Main outcome measures: Composite adverse outcome (perinatal death, Apgar score 5' < 7, NICU admission, meconium aspiration syndrome), composite severe adverse perinatal outcome (all above with Apgar score 5' < 4 instead of < 7) and caesarean section. Results: From 2012-2016, 3642 women out of 6088 eligible women for the INDEX RCT, participated in the cohort study for observational data collection (induction of labour n = 372; expectant management n = 2174; unknown preference/management strategy n = 1096).Adverse perinatal outcome occurred in 1.1 % (4/372) in the induction group versus 1.9 % (42/2174) in the expectant group (adjRR 0.56; 95 %CI: 0.17-1.79), with severe adverse perinatal outcome occurring in 0.3 % (1/372) versus 1.0 % (22/2174), respectively (adjRR 0.39; 95 % CI: 0.05-2.88). There were no stillbirths among all 3642 women; one neonatal death occurred in the unknown preference/management group. Caesarean section rates were 10.5 % (39/372) after induction and 8.9 % (193/2174) after expectant management (adjRR 1.32; 95 % CI: 0.95-1.84).A higher incidence of adverse perinatal outcome was observed in nulliparous compared to multiparous women. Nulliparous 1.8 % (3/170) in the induction group versus 2.6 % (30/1134) in the expectant management group (adjRR 0.58; 95 % CI 0.14-2.41), multiparous 0.5 % (1/201) versus 1.1 % (11/1039) (adjRR 0.54; 95 % CI 0.07-24.19). One maternal death due to amniotic fluid embolism occurred after elective induction at 41 weeks + 6 days. Conclusion: In this cohort study among low-risk women receiving the policy of their preference in late-term pregnancy, a non-significant difference was found between induction of labour at 41 weeks and expectant management until 42 weeks in absolute risks of composite

Indexed as

Cesarean sectionExpectant managementInduction of laborLate-term pregnancyMaternal outcomePerinatal outcome

Identifiers

PMID36262791
PMCPMC9574420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.