ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2022
Toward Drainless Breast Reconstruction: A Pilot Study.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Management of complications following implant-based breast reconstruction: a narrative review.Annals of translational medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Implant-based breast reconstruction with immediate tissue expander placement is the predominant form of breast reconstruction in the United States. Closed-suction drains are frequently employed to minimize seroma accumulation, although they carry the risk of serving as a port of entry for bacteria, posing a concern in the presence of implanted materials such as breast implants or acellular dermal matrix. Introduction of a dual-port tissue expander designed to facilitate the collection and removal of seroma fluid provides a new way of performing breast reconstruction without external drains. Methods: We conducted a pilot study using the AlloX2 dual-port expander on five consecutive patients to demonstrate feasibility of this approach at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center by the two senior authors (E.R. and D.K.). Results: Patients averaged seven clinic visits before they were ready for expander exchange, totaling a mean of 137.5 days. Patients averaged 1.9 clinic visits before output was less than 40cm Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of breast reconstruction without external drains using a dual-port expander with built-in seroma reservoir. From these results, it is apparent that dual-port tissue expanders with built-in seroma reservoir offer a safe and effective way to perform breast reconstruction without drains in appropriately selected patients. A larger prospective cohort will be needed to definitively demonstrate lower infection and reconstructive failure rates.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.