Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36262631›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2022

Employing Respondent Driven Sampling (RDS) to recruit people who inject drugs (PWID) and other hard-to-reach populations during COVID-19: Lessons learned.

Roberto Abadie, Patrick Habecker, Kimberly Gocchi Carrasco, Kathy S Chiou, Samodha Fernando, Sydney J Bennett, Aníbal Valentin-Acevedo, Kirk Dombrowski, John T West, Charles Wood

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Roberto AbadieSchool of Global and Integrative Studies, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, United States.
Patrick HabeckerDepartment of Sociology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, United States.
Kimberly Gocchi CarrascoDepartment of Sociology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, United States.
Kathy S ChiouDepartment of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, United States.
Samodha FernandoDepartment of Animal Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, United States.
Sydney J BennettSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, United States.
Aníbal Valentin-AcevedoDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Universidad Central del Caribe, Bayamón, PR, United States.
Kirk DombrowskiUniversity of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States.
John T WestDepartment of Interdisciplinary Oncology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Louisiana Cancer Research Center, New Orleans, LA, United States.
Charles WoodSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, United States.
University of Nebraska–Lincoln · USLouisiana State University · USCentral University of the Caribbean · PRUniversity of Vermont · US

Funding

Biomarkers for Dysbiosis-Related HIV-Associated Cognitive Disorders among Persons Who Inject Drugs in Puerto RicoR01DA047823 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI WOOD, CHARLES · 2019 to 2024
$2.5M
Comparative Virology Research Training ProgramT32AI125207 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI WEAVER, ERIC A · 2016 to 2020
$844k
NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI125207NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA047823
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Respondent Driven Sampling (RDS) is an effective sampling strategy to recruit hard-to-reach populations but the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the use of this strategy in the collection of data involving human subjects, particularly among marginalized and vulnerable populations, is not known. Based on an ongoing study using RDS to recruit and study the interactions between HIV infection, injection drug use, and the microbiome in Puerto Rico, this paper explores the effectiveness of RDS during the pandemic and provided potential strategies that could improve recruitment and data collection. Results: RDS was employed to evaluate its effectiveness in recruiting a group of people who inject drugs (PWID) and controls ( Findings: Results show that recruitment through peer networks using RDS was possible across all sub-groups. Yet, while those in the HIV+ PWID sub-group managed to recruit from other-sub groups of HIV- PWID and HIV+, this occurred at a lower frequency. Conclusion: Despite the barriers introduced by COVID-19, it is clear that even in this environment, RDS continues to play a powerful role in recruiting hard-to-reach populations. Yet, more attention should be paid at how future pandemics, natural disasters, and other big events might affect RDS recruitment of vulnerable and hard-to-reach populations.

Indexed as

COVID-19HIVpeople who inject drugs (PWID)Puerto RicorecruitmentRespondent Driven Sampling

Identifiers

PMID36262631
PMCPMC9574048
OpenAlexW4300427097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.