ArticleIndian dermatology online journal
Teledermatology Services during COVID-19 Pandemic: Experience of a Tertiary Care center in Western India.
Article in Indian dermatology online journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Teledermatology in alopecia: A systematic review.JAAD international · 2024Article
- Use of telemedicine to tackle health problems in South Asia during the COVID-19 era and beyond: a systematic review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Telemedicine has emerged as an important tool in providing patient care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Hence, we aimed to study the clinico-epidemiological profile of patients seen in the teledermatology outpatient department (OPD) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Material and Methods: Retrospective data analysis of records of patients, who consulted in telemedicine OPD from 20 April 2020 to 5 Feb 2021 was done. Results: Out of 2524 patients registered for teledermatology consultation, 2117 completed the process of teleconsultation. The mean age of patients was 35.59 ± 15.60 years. There was a male preponderance with 1372 (64.81%) patients while females were 745 (35.19%). 1773 (83.75%) patients were managed on telemedicine alone and 344 (17.42%) patients required face to face physical consultation. The most common disorder was dermatophytosis seen in 316 (17.82%) followed by hair disorders like androgenetic alopecia and telogen effluvium in 239 (13.48%), acne in 238 (13.42%) and dermatitis in 196 (11.05%). Blood investigations were advised in 365 (17.24%) patients and skin biopsy was advised in 23 (1.09%) patients. The major causes for incomplete teleconsultation procedure were no response to telephone calls in 207 (8.2%), 76 (3.01%) patients had taken a prior consultation and 60 (2.37%) patients didn't give consent for teleconsultation. Conclusion: Common dermatological diseases like tinea, acne, hair disorders and dermatitis can be managed on telemedicine alone. In India, there are fewer dermatologists per population, therefore telemedicine can be continued even after the pandemic is over in cases where diagnoses and treatment are straight forward.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.