Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36262541›Full record

ArticleJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2022

Determination of gastric atrophy with artificial intelligence compared to the assessments of the modified Kyoto and OLGA classifications.

Yasuhiro Kodaka, Seiji Futagami, Yoshiyuki Watanabe, Satoki Shichijo, Noriya Uedo, Hiroyuki Aono, Kumiko Kirita, Yusuke Kato, Nobue Ueki, Shuhei Agawa and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yasuhiro KodakaDivision of Gastroenterology Nippon Medical School Tokyo Japan.
Seiji FutagamiDivision of Gastroenterology Nippon Medical School Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0502-8646
Yoshiyuki WatanabeDivision of Gastroenterology Nippon Medical School Tokyo Japan.
Satoki ShichijoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology Osaka International Cancer Institute Osaka Japan.
Noriya UedoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology Osaka International Cancer Institute Osaka Japan.
Hiroyuki AonoAI Medical Service Inc. Tokyo Japan.
Kumiko KiritaDivision of Gastroenterology Nippon Medical School Tokyo Japan.
Yusuke KatoAI Medical Service Inc. Tokyo Japan.
Nobue UekiDivision of Gastroenterology Nippon Medical School Tokyo Japan.
Shuhei AgawaDivision of Gastroenterology Nippon Medical School Tokyo Japan.
Hiroshi YamawakiDivision of Gastroenterology Nippon Medical School Tokyo Japan.
Katsuhiko IwakiriDivision of Gastroenterology Nippon Medical School Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5558-6104
Tomohiro TadaAI Medical Service Inc. Tokyo Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aim: Gastric atrophy is a precancerous lesion. We aimed to clarify whether gastric atrophy determined by artificial intelligence (AI) correlates with the diagnosis made by expert endoscopists using several endoscopic classifications, the Operative Link on Gastritis Assessment (OLGA) classification based on histological findings, and genotypes associated with gastric atrophy and cancer. Methods: Two hundred seventy Results: There were significant correlations between determinations of gastric atrophy by AI and by expert endoscopists using not only the Kimura-Takemoto classification ( Conclusion: Combinations of AI and the modified Kyoto classification or of AI and the OLGA classification could be useful tools for evaluating gastric atrophy in patients with

Indexed as

artificial intelligencegastric atrophyKyoto classificationOperative Link on Gastritis Assessment classification

Identifiers

PMID36262541
PMCPMC9575326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.