ArticleHeliyon2022
Automating the extraction of information from a historical text and building a linked data model for the domain of ecology and conservation science.
Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A review on knowledge and information extraction from PDF documents and storage approaches.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Pooled it
- Utilizing large language models to construct a dataset of Württemberg's 19th-century fauna from historical records.PloS one · 2026Article
- Data mobilisation for historical records of vascular plants in eastern Asia: V. L. Komarov's expedition to Far-Eastern Russia, China and Korea from 1895 to 1897.Biodiversity data journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Data heterogeneity is a pressing issue and is further compounded if we have to deal with data from textual documents. The unstructured nature of such documents implies that collating, comparing and analysing the information contained therein can be a challenging task. Automating these processes can help to unleash insightful knowledge that otherwise remains buried in them. Moreover, integrating the extracted information from the documents with other related information can help to make more information-rich queries. In this context, the paper presents a comprehensive review of text extraction and data integration techniques to enable this automation process in an ecological context. The paper investigates into extracting valuable floristic information from a historical Botany journal. The purpose behind this extraction is to bring to light relevant pieces of information contained within the document. In addition, the paper also explores the need to integrate the extracted information together with other related information from disparate sources. All the information is then rendered into a query-able form in order to make unified queries. Hence, the paper makes use of a combination of Machine Learning, Natural Language Processing and Semantic Web techniques to achieve this. The proposed approach is demonstrated through the information extracted from the journal and the information-rich queries made through the integration process. The paper shows that the approach has a merit in extracting relevant information from the journal, discusses how the machine learning models have been designed to classify complex information and also gives a measure of their performance. The paper also shows that the approach has a merit in query time in regard to querying floristic information from a multi-source linked data model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.