Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36262226›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

The impact of pharmacist-led antimicrobial stewardship program on antibiotic use in a county-level tertiary general hospital in China: A retrospective study using difference-in-differences design.

Ying Wang, Chongchong Zhou, Chengying Liu, Shuanghai Liu, Xiaoliang Liu, Xin Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ying WangDepartment of Infection Management, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Chongchong ZhouDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Chengying LiuDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, The Affiliated Jiangyin Hospital of Nantong University, Jiangyin, China.
Shuanghai LiuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Jiangyin Hospital of Nantong University, Jiangyin, China.
Xiaoliang LiuDepartment of Infection Management, The Affiliated Jiangyin Hospital of Nantong University, Jiangyin, China.
Xin LiSchool of Health Policy and Management, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Jiangyin People's Hospital · CNNanjing Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Inappropriate use of antibiotics has become a major driver for the spread of antimicrobial resistance globally, particularly common in China. Antimicrobial stewardship programs are effective in optimizing antimicrobial use and decreasing the emergence of multi-drug-resistant organisms, and the pharmacist has performed a leading role in this program. Objective: To evaluate the impact of antimicrobial stewardship programs driven by pharmacists on antibiotic consumption and costs and the appropriateness of antibiotic use. Methods: A single-center retrospective quasi-experimental design was conducted in two independent hepatobiliary surgery wards and two independent respiratory wards in a county-level tertiary general hospital in Jiangsu, China. Each intervention group was served with antimicrobial stewardship programs with prescriptions audit and feedback, antibiotics restriction, education, and training. The propensity score matching method was employed to balance confounding variables between the intervention group and control group, and a difference-in-differences analysis was used to evaluate the impact of antimicrobial stewardship programs. The primary outcome was measured by scores of rationality evaluation of antibiotics. Results: The DID results demonstrated that the implementation of the antimicrobial stewardship programs was associated with a reduction in the average length of hospital stay (coefficient = -3.234, Conclusion: The result reveals that the implementation of the antimicrobial stewardship programs is effective in reducing the length of hospital stay, decreasing antibiotics consumption and costs, and improving the appropriateness of antimicrobial use such as decreasing irrational use of cephalosporins, reducing combinations, and improving timely conversion. However, great attention ought to be paid to the improper use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. The government is responsible for providing sustainable formal education for pharmacists, and more funding and staff support to promote antimicrobial stewardship programs.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsAntimicrobial StewardshipAnti-Bacterial AgentsCephalosporinsHospitals, GeneralHumansPharmacistsRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsCephalosporinsantibiotics useantimicrobial stewardshipcounty-level general hospitaldifference-in-differencespharmacist

Identifiers

PMID36262226
PMCPMC9574199
OpenAlexW4300089375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.