Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36262172›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of heart failure2020

Donor Heart Utilization in Korea.

In-Cheol Kim, Jong-Chan Youn, Sang Eun Lee, Sung-Ho Jung, Jae-Joong Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of heart failure, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Management of potential cardiac donors.Clinical transplantation and research · 2024
    Review
  6. What Is the Right Direction for theInternational journal of heart failure · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Advanced heart failure: a contemporary approach.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Characteristics, outcomes, and predictors ofFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

In-Cheol KimDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Keimyung University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5751-2328
Jong-Chan YounDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0998-503X
Sang Eun LeeDepartment of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7290-2463
Sung-Ho JungDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3699-0312
Jae-Joong KimDepartment of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2714-2282

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Donor heart utilization patterns in Korea are not well known. We aimed to analyze the current utilization rate of donor heart and to evaluate the reason for non-utilization in Korea. Methods: Brain death donors were identified from the Korean Network for Organ Sharing registry from November 2009 to December 2019. Baseline characteristics and heart transplant related parameters were compared between transplanted and discarded donor hearts. Results: Among 4,401 donors, 1,383 (31.4%) hearts were utilized. Hearts from younger, male donors without history of hypertension or diabetes mellitus were utilized more frequently. The most common blood type in the transplanted group was O, while blood type A was the most common blood type in the discarded group. The ejection fraction in the discarded group were significantly lower (57.0 ± 13.5% vs. 61.7 ± 7.0%, p<0.001). Reasons for non-utilization were as follows: medical condition (34.4%), old age (31.8%), refused by all candidates (22.5%), refused to donate (11.0%), and others (0.2%). The most common cause of brain death was cerebrovascular disease in both the transplanted and discarded groups, but the incidence was significantly higher in the discarded group (46.8% vs. 37.5%, p<0.001). In multivariate analysis, old age, small body surface area, rapid heart rate, blood type other than O, abnormal echocardiography findings were independent predictors for non-utilization. Conclusions: Average donor heart utilization rate was 31.4% and it improved to 42.9% in 2019. However, substantial numbers of donor hearts are still discarded. A strategic approach to improve donor heart utilization is necessary.

Indexed as

Donor selectionHeart transplantationKorea

Identifiers

PMID36262172
PMCPMC9536728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.