ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2022
Clinical Comparative Study of Different Fundus Imaging Methods in the Acute Phase of Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada Disease.
Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The diversification of follow-up ophthalmic imaging examination methods, and whether there are differences in clinical characteristics of VKH at the acute stage under different images. Our study aims to compare the imaging characteristics of the acute phase of Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease (VKH) under different fundus imaging methods to deepen clinical knowledge. Methods: A retrospective case study was performed on fundus images of 62 eyes from 31 patients with acute phase VKH and a disease duration ≤2 months who were treated at Ganzhou People's Hospital from January 2013 to December 2020. Fundus photography (FP), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) were performed on all 62 eyes. The fundus presentations were divided into an optic disc swelling (ODS) group, a serous retinal detachment (SRD) group, and a mixed type (MT) group (both ODS and SRD), and the proportions of patients in these groups and the coincidence rate of ODS, SRD, and MT identified by the three fundus imaging modes were determined. Results: The proportion of patients with ODS was highest under FP, and the proportion of patients with MT was highest under OCT. The proportions of patients with ODS and MT in the three fundus imaging modes differed significantly ( Conclusion: Clinically significant positive signs could be obtained for acute VKH under different imaging methods. However, compared with FP and FFA, OCT tomography is more intuitive for the observation of lesions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.