ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2022
Physical human locomotion prediction using manifold regularization.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimized multi-modal action recognition using multi-agent systems and adaptive temporal attention.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Deep locomotion prediction learning over biosensors, ambient sensors, and computer vision.PloS one · 2026Article
- Intelligent ADL Recognition via IoT-Based Multimodal Deep Learning Framework.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Intelligent Localization and Deep Human Activity Recognition through IoT Devices.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A Multimodal IoT-Based Locomotion Classification System Using Features Engineering and Recursive Neural Network.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human locomotion is an imperative topic to be conversed among researchers. Predicting the human motion using multiple techniques and algorithms has always been a motivating subject matter. For this, different methods have shown the ability of recognizing simple motion patterns. However, predicting the dynamics for complex locomotion patterns is still immature. Therefore, this article proposes unique methods including the calibration-based filter algorithm and kinematic-static patterns identification for predicting those complex activities from fused signals. Different types of signals are extracted from benchmarked datasets and pre-processed using a novel calibration-based filter for inertial signals along with a Bessel filter for physiological signals. Next, sliding overlapped windows are utilized to get motion patterns defined over time. Then, polynomial probability distribution is suggested to decide the motion patterns natures. For features extraction based kinematic-static patterns, time and probability domain features are extracted over physical action dataset (PAD) and growing old together validation (GOTOV) dataset. Further, the features are optimized using quadratic discriminant analysis and orthogonal fuzzy neighborhood discriminant analysis techniques. Manifold regularization algorithms have also been applied to assess the performance of proposed prediction system. For the physical action dataset, we achieved an accuracy rate of 82.50% for patterned signals. While, the GOTOV dataset, we achieved an accuracy rate of 81.90%. As a result, the proposed system outdid when compared to the other state-of-the-art models in literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.