Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36262064›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental analysis, health and toxicology2022

Comparison between self-reported smoking habits and daily ad-libitum smoking topography in a group of Korean smokers.

Jiyeon Yang, Shervin Hashemi, Chaelin Lee, Wonseok Han, Yoojin Song, Youngwook Lim

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental analysis, health and toxicology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jiyeon YangInstitute for Environmental Research, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.
Shervin HashemiInstitute for Environmental Research, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.
Chaelin LeeGraduate School of Public Health, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.
Wonseok HanGraduate School of Public Health, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.
Yoojin SongInstitute for Environmental Research, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.
Youngwook LimInstitute for Environmental Research, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.
Yonsei University · KRDurban University of Technology · ZA

Funding

Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency 2019-E6704-00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tobacco smoking is associated with a high global mortality rate since it is known to cause cancers and lung and heart diseases. To control and reduce annual mortality attributed to smoking, it is essential to design applicable smoke cessation programs based on realistic tobacco exposure risk assessment. In this regard, understanding the smoking habits of the smoker is crucial. Using self-report smoking habit surveys is a common approach in measuring basic variables of smoking habits. However, smoking topography measurement devices have recently become available for investigating smoking habit variables accurately. In this study, we conducted a self-report survey to investigate a group of Korean smokers' smoking habit variables such as the number of smoked cigarettes per day, puff counts, and total smoking time. The survey also included items from the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND). The results were compared with the corresponding variables from machine-determined data to investigate their correlation and reliability. Results indicate that Korean smokers have a reliable understanding of the average number of cigarettes they smoke daily (ρ = 0.517, Cronbach's α = 0.754) and the time to first cigarette (TTFC) after waking up (ρ = -0.587, Cronbach's α = 0.623), as fundamental items of the FTND score. Nevertheless, these smokers significantly under-reported the puff number and total smoking time, which can cause significant underestimation in the tobacco exposure risk assessment. Consequently, we suggest the application of self-report surveys that are based on the amount of daily smoked cigarettes (e.g. FTND) for clinical or risk assessment purposes. Using smoking topography measurement devices is recommended overusing self-report surveys in measuring smoking habit variables such as puff count and smoking time more accurately.

Indexed as

Ad-libitum smoking topographyCPDpuff countsself-report surveysmoking habitstotal smoking time

Identifiers

PMID36262064
PMCPMC9582419
OpenAlexW4285728917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.