Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36262043›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2023

Mechanistic dissection of antibody inhibition of influenza entry yields unexpected heterogeneity.

Anjali Sengar, Marcos Cervantes, Peter M Kasson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Membranes in focus.Biophysical journal · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anjali SengarDepartments of Molecular Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Marcos CervantesDepartments of Molecular Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Peter M KassonDepartments of Molecular Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia; Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. Electronic address: kassonlab@gmail.com.
University of Virginia · USUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neutralizing antibodies against influenza have generally been classified according to their recognition sites, with antibodies against the head domain of hemagglutinin thought to inhibit attachment and antibodies against the stalk region thought to inhibit fusion. Here, we report the development of a microfluidic assay to measure neutralization of viral entry that can clearly differentiate between effects on attachment and fusion. Testing multiple broadly neutralizing antibodies against the hemagglutinin stalk domain, we obtain a surprising result: some broadly neutralizing antibodies inhibit fusion only, while others inhibit both fusion and viral attachment. Antibodies binding the globular head domain primarily inhibit attachment but can also reduce the fusogenic capability of viral particles that nonetheless bind the receptor. These findings shed light on the unexpectedly heterogeneous mechanisms of antibody neutralization even within similar recognition sites. The assay we have developed also provides a tool to optimize vaccine design by permitting assessment of the elicited antibody response with greater mechanistic resolution.

Indexed as

Influenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesOrthomyxoviridae InfectionsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralBroadly Neutralizing AntibodiesHemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza VirusHemagglutininsHumansAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralBroadly Neutralizing AntibodiesHemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza VirusHemagglutininsInfluenza Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID36262043
PMCPMC10257021
OpenAlexW4306774320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.