Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36261818›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2022

LLIN Evaluation in Uganda Project (LLINEUP2)-Factors associated with coverage and use of long‑lasting insecticidal nets following the 2020-21 national mass distribution campaign: a cross-sectional survey of 12 districts.

Jaffer Okiring, Samuel Gonahasa, Martha Nassali, Jane F Namuganga, Irene Bagala, Catherine Maiteki-Sebuguzi, Jimmy Opigo, Isaiah Nabende, Joanita Nangendo, Jane Kabami and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Jaffer OkiringClinical Epidemiology Unit, School of Medicine, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda. okjaffer@gmail.com.
Samuel GonahasaInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, PO Box 7475, Kampala, Uganda.
Martha NassaliInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, PO Box 7475, Kampala, Uganda.
Jane F NamugangaInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, PO Box 7475, Kampala, Uganda.
Irene BagalaInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, PO Box 7475, Kampala, Uganda.
Catherine Maiteki-SebuguziInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, PO Box 7475, Kampala, Uganda.
Jimmy OpigoNational Malaria Control Division, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Isaiah NabendeInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, PO Box 7475, Kampala, Uganda.
Joanita NangendoClinical Epidemiology Unit, School of Medicine, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
Jane KabamiClinical Epidemiology Unit, School of Medicine, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
Isaac SsewanyanaInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, PO Box 7475, Kampala, Uganda.
Steven M KiwuwaDepartment of Child Health and Development Centre, School of Medicine, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
Joaniter I NankabirwaClinical Epidemiology Unit, School of Medicine, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
Grant DorseyDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.
Jessica BriggsDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.
Moses R KamyaInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, PO Box 7475, Kampala, Uganda.
Sarah G StaedkeInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, PO Box 7475, Kampala, Uganda.

Funding

Transmission ProjectU19AI089674 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MATTHEW G DORSEY, MOSES Robert KAMYA · 2010 to 2026
$29.3M
Training in malaria surveillance, epidemiology and implementation science research to strengthen malaria policy and control in UgandaD43TW010526 · FIC · MAKERERE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MATTHEW G DORSEY, MOSES Robert KAMYA · 2017 to 2026
$2.3M
Improving the accuracy of malaria surveillance with serology and parasite genetic dataK23AI166009 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Jessica Briggs · 2022 to 2026
$955k
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation INV-017893Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation INV-023690FIC NIH HHS D43 TW010526NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI166009NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI089674
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2020-2021, long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) were distributed nationwide in Uganda during the COVID-19 pandemic. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 12 districts to evaluate the impact of the campaign 1-5 months after LLIN distribution.

methodsDuring April-May 2021, households were randomly selected from target areas (1-7 villages) surrounding 12 government-run health facilities established as Malaria Reference Centres; at least 50 households were enrolled per cluster. Outcomes included household ownership of LLINs distributed through the universal coverage campaign (UCC) (at least one UCC LLIN), adequate coverage of UCC LLINs (at least one UCC LLIN per 2 residents), and use of LLINs (resident slept under a LLIN the previous night). Multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify household- and individual-level factors associated with outcomes, controlling for clustering around health facilities.

resultsIn total, 634 households, with 3342 residents and 1631 bed-nets, were included. Most households (93.4%) owned at least 1 UCC LLIN, but only 56.8% were adequately covered by UCC LLINs. In an adjusted analysis, the factor most strongly associated with adequate coverage by UCC LLINs was fewer household residents (1-4 vs 7-14; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 12.96, 95% CI 4.76-35.26, p < 0.001; 5-6 vs 7-14 residents; aOR 2.99, 95% CI 1.21-7.42, p = 0.018). Of the 3166 residents of households that owned at least one UCC LLIN, only 1684 (53.2%) lived in adequately covered households; 89.9% of these used an LLIN the previous night, compared to 1034 (69.8%) of 1482 residents living in inadequately covered households. In an adjusted analysis, restricted to residents of inadequately covered households, LLIN use was higher in children under-five than those aged 5-15 years (aOR 3.04, 95% CI 2.08-4.46, p < 0.001), and higher in household heads than distantly-related residents (aOR 3.94, 95% CI 2.38-6.51, p < 0.001).

conclusionsUganda's 2021-21 campaign was successful, despite the COVID-19 pandemic. In future campaigns, strategies should be adopted to ensure high LLIN coverage, particularly for larger households. A better understanding of the drivers of LLIN use within households is needed to guide future interventions, educational messages, and behaviour change communication strategies; school-aged children and distantly-related residents appear vulnerable and could be targeted.

Indexed as

COVID-19Insecticide-Treated BednetsAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFamily CharacteristicsHumansPandemicsUgandaCoverageLong-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs)MalariaMass distribution campaignOwnershipUganda

Identifiers

PMID36261818
PMCPMC9580445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.