ArticlePituitary2022
Impact of histopathological classification of non-functioning adenomas on long term outcomes: comparison of the 2004 and 2017 WHO classifications.
Article in Pituitary, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cell Lineage-Specific Differences in Clinical Behavior of Non-Functioning Pituitary Adenomas.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025Article
- The 2022 WHO classification of tumors of the pituitary gland: An update on aggressive and metastatic pituitary neuroendocrine tumors.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Pathological characteristics of reoperated regrowing clinically nonfunctioning pituitary tumor cases in comparison with initial surgical cases.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- Refractory nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas.Pituitary · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOutcomes of patients with non-functioning pituitary adenomas categorized using the 2004 and 2017 WHO classification systems are understudied. We report outcomes from the University of Virginia of patients with non-functioning pituitary adenomas categorized using both systems.
methodsWe constructed a database from all 239 patients who underwent resection of a non-functioning pituitary adenoma between 2003 and 2015 and had at least 5 years of follow-up. Pathologic diagnosis was determined under both the 2004 and 2017 WHO classification systems. We compared the rates of recurrence and progression between subtypes using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses.
resultsNearly 30% of the tumors in our database were classified as null cell adenomas under the 2004 classification system, whereas only 10% of the tumors were classified as null cell adenomas using the 2017 classification system. Most of these tumors were reclassified as either corticotroph or gonadotroph adenomas. Despite our relatively large cohort and average follow-up of nearly 9 years, we did not detect a significant difference in recurrence and progression between subtypes.
conclusionsThe majority of null cell adenomas diagnosed under the 2004 WHO classification system are reclassified as gonadotroph or corticotroph adenomas under the 2017 WHO classification system. Rates of progression and recurrence between subtypes are not as different as previously believed at our institution and require a larger cohort to further investigate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36261697What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.