Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36261688›Full record

ArticleFamilial cancer2023

Next-generation universal hereditary cancer screening: implementation of an automated hereditary cancer screening program for patients with advanced cancer undergoing tumor sequencing in a large HMO.

Trevor L Hoffman, Hilary Kershberg, John Goff, Kimberly J Holmquist, Reina Haque, Monica Alvarado

Open access · hybridFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Familial cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Trevor L HoffmanDepartment of Regional Genetics, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Pasadena, CA, USA. Trevor.L.Hoffman@kp.org.ORCID 0000-0002-1612-0213
Hilary KershbergDepartment of Regional Genetics, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Pasadena, CA, USA.
John GoffDepartment of Regional Genetics, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Kimberly J HolmquistDepartment of Research & Evaluation, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Reina HaqueDepartment of Research & Evaluation, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Monica AlvaradoDepartment of Regional Genetics, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Colorado Permanente Medical Group · USKaiser Permanente · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Variants in hereditary cancer risk genes are frequently identified following tumor-based DNA sequencing and represent an opportunity to diagnose hereditary cancer. We implemented an automated hereditary cancer screening program in a large HMO for all patients who underwent tumor-based DNA sequencing to identify patients with hereditary cancer and determine if this approach augmented existing genetic counseling approaches driven by personal/family history criteria. Regular automated searches of a centralized tumor DNA variant database were performed for ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PALB2, and/or PMS2 variants, and germline hereditary cancer gene panel testing was offered to patients with tumor variants who had never undergone germline testing. Patients completing germline testing due to their tumor DNA test results were considered part of the tumor DNA safety net. Patients previously completing germline testing via traditional genetic counseling and tumor DNA safety net were compared for demographics, tumor type, presence of germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variant, and whether NCCN criteria were met for hereditary cancer genetic testing. Germline P/LP variants were common in both groups. Patients who received germline testing through traditional genetic counseling were more likely to have cardinal hereditary tumors than the tumor DNA safety net group. Patients identified with hereditary cancer through traditional genetic counseling were more likely to meet NCCN personal/family history criteria for germline testing than the tumor DNA safety net group (99% versus 34%). A universal tumor DNA safety net screen is an important diagnostic strategy which augments traditional genetic counseling approaches based on personal/family history.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseNeoplastic Syndromes, HereditaryEarly Detection of CancerGenetic TestingGerm-Line MutationHealth Maintenance OrganizationsHumans

Identifiers

PMID36261688
PMCPMC10020326
OpenAlexW4306850140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read73
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.