ArticleScientific reports2022
Reconstruction of time-shifted hemodynamic response.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Timing Is Everything: Temporal Dynamics of BOLD Responses to Naturalistic Features in Movie Watching.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Performance control during longitudinal activation fMRI studies.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Regression of voxel time course onto expected response is a standard procedure in functional magnetic resonance imaging that relies on exact onset time and shape of superimposed hemodynamic response functions. Elegant capture of time deviation by time derivative regressors appears complicated by shape distortion and limited to ±1 s, and is usually not exploited for reconstructing the true time-shifted response function together with its magnitude. This analysis of the time-derivative approach provides closed-form functional relations between time shift and regression coefficients that allow for hemodynamic shifts of ±5 s and can explain shape distortion and reconstruction behavior. Reliable absolute latencies were no smaller than 0.6 s in a best-case experiment. Confusions of latency are a previously undiscussed shortcoming where current limitation strategy may eliminate correct latencies and protect incorrect ones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.