Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36261644›Full record

Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2023

An intraoperative artificial intelligence system identifying anatomical landmarks for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective clinical feasibility trial (J-SUMMIT-C-01).

Hiroaki Nakanuma, Yuichi Endo, Atsuro Fujinaga, Masahiro Kawamura, Takahide Kawasaki, Takashi Masuda, Teijiro Hirashita, Tsuyoshi Etoh, Ken'ichi Shinozuka, Yusuke Matsunobu and 5 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Hiroaki NakanumaDepartment of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, 1-1 Idaigaoka, Hasama-machi, Yufu, Oita, 879-5593, Japan. h-nakanuma@oita-u.ac.jp.
Yuichi EndoDepartment of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, 1-1 Idaigaoka, Hasama-machi, Yufu, Oita, 879-5593, Japan.
Atsuro FujinagaDepartment of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, 1-1 Idaigaoka, Hasama-machi, Yufu, Oita, 879-5593, Japan.
Masahiro KawamuraDepartment of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, 1-1 Idaigaoka, Hasama-machi, Yufu, Oita, 879-5593, Japan.
Takahide KawasakiDepartment of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, 1-1 Idaigaoka, Hasama-machi, Yufu, Oita, 879-5593, Japan.
Takashi MasudaDepartment of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, 1-1 Idaigaoka, Hasama-machi, Yufu, Oita, 879-5593, Japan.
Teijiro HirashitaDepartment of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, 1-1 Idaigaoka, Hasama-machi, Yufu, Oita, 879-5593, Japan.
Tsuyoshi EtohDepartment of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, 1-1 Idaigaoka, Hasama-machi, Yufu, Oita, 879-5593, Japan.
Ken'ichi ShinozukaDepartment of Information System and Engineering, Fukuoka Institute of Technology, Fukuoka, Japan.
Yusuke MatsunobuDepartment of Information System and Engineering, Fukuoka Institute of Technology, Fukuoka, Japan.
Toshiya KamiyamaR&D, Customer Solutions Development, Platform Technology, Olympus Technologies Asia, Hachioji, Japan.
Makoto IshikakeR&D, Customer Solutions Development, Platform Technology, Olympus Technologies Asia, Hachioji, Japan.
Kohei EbeR&D, Customer Solutions Development, Platform Technology, Olympus Technologies Asia, Hachioji, Japan.
Tatsushi TokuyasuDepartment of Information System and Engineering, Fukuoka Institute of Technology, Fukuoka, Japan.
Masafumi InomataDepartment of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, 1-1 Idaigaoka, Hasama-machi, Yufu, Oita, 879-5593, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe have implemented Smart Endoscopic Surgery (SES), a surgical system that uses artificial intelligence (AI) to detect the anatomical landmarks that expert surgeons base on to perform certain surgical maneuvers. No report has verified the use of AI-based support systems for surgery in clinical practice, and no evaluation method has been established. To evaluate the detection performance of SES, we have developed and established a new evaluation method by conducting a clinical feasibility trial.

methodsA single-center prospective clinical feasibility trial was conducted on 10 cases of LC performed at Oita University hospital. Subsequently, an external evaluation committee (EEC) evaluated the AI detection accuracy for each landmark using five-grade rubric evaluation and DICE coefficient. We defined LM-CBD as the expert surgeon's "judge" of the cystic bile duct in endoscopic images.

resultsThe average detection accuracy on the rubric by the EEC was 4.2 ± 0.8 for the LM-CBD. The DICE coefficient between the AI detection area of the LM-CBD and the EEC members' evaluation was similar to the mean value of the DICE coefficient between the EEC members. The DICE coefficient was high score for the case that was highly evaluated by the EEC on a five-grade scale.

conclusionThis is the first feasible clinical trial of an AI system designed for intraoperative use and to evaluate the AI system using an EEC. In the future, this concept of evaluation for the AI system would contribute to the development of new AI navigation systems for surgery.

Indexed as

Cholecystectomy, LaparoscopicArtificial IntelligenceBile DuctsFeasibility StudiesHumansProspective StudiesAI navigation surgeryAnatomical landmarksBile duct injuryClinical feasibility trialDICE coefficientLaparoscopic cholecystectomy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.