Trial reportLasers in medical science2022
Clinical efficacy of Er:YAG laser application in pulpotomy of primary molars: a 2-year follow-up study.
Trial report in Lasers in medical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Assessing the efficacy of Laser pulpotomy versus conventional pulpotomy in primary teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.Lasers in medical science · 2024Pooled it
- Application of the Er:YAG laser in pulpotomy for mature permanent teeth with pulpitis: An animal study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Laser Pulpotomies' Clinical and Radiographic Success in Primary Teeth by Type of Laser.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Effect of Er: YAG Laser Pulse Width on Shear Bond Strength Between Layered Ceramic and Zirconia Substructure.Journal of lasers in medical sciences · 2025Article
- Current Applications and Future Directions of Lasers in Endodontics: A Narrative Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The present study aimed to analyze the clinical effects of Er:YAG laser applied in pulpotomy of children's asymptomatic deep caries-affected primary molars. Included primary molar teeth from children (aged 3 ~ 6 years) were randomly assigned to "Er:YAG laser" and "conventional" groups, and pulpotomies were performed under general anesthesia using the respective approaches. The treatment time and clinical efficacy were evaluated. The study sample included 100 primary molar teeth of 40 children with an average age of 4.60 ± 1.02 years. The pulpotomy time in the Er:YAG laser group was significantly longer than that in the conventional group (p < 0.0001) but the hemostasis time and the total treatment time were significantly shorter (p < 0.0001, p = 0.029). In terms of clinical efficacy, up to 6 months after treatment, the success rate in the Er:YAG laser group was non-significantly but slightly higher than that in the conventional group (100% versus 98%, p = 0.436). With longer observation time, the success rate of both groups declined, with the conventional group showing a more rapid decline. After 24 months, the success rate in the Er:YAG laser group remained non-significantly higher than that in the conventional group (89.58% versus 82.98%, p = 0.386). Overall, Er:YAG laser significantly reduced the treatment time for pulpotomy in primary teeth and tended to produce higher clinical efficacy over time and thus can be a valuable tool in clinical pediatric dentistry practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36261616What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.