ArticleScientific reports2022
Adapted tensor decomposition and PCA based unsupervised feature extraction select more biologically reasonable differentially expressed genes than conventional methods.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tensor Decomposition-Based Unsupervised Feature Extraction Applied to Bioinformatics.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Article
- Application note: TDbasedUFE and TDbasedUFEadv: bioconductor packages to perform tensor decomposition based unsupervised feature extraction.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tensor decomposition- and principal component analysis-based unsupervised feature extraction were proposed almost 5 and 10 years ago, respectively; although these methods have been successfully applied to a wide range of genome analyses, including drug repositioning, biomarker identification, and disease-causing genes' identification, some fundamental problems have been identified: the number of genes identified was too small to assume that there were no false negatives, and the histogram of P values derived was not fully coincident with the null hypothesis that principal component and singular value vectors follow the Gaussian distribution. Optimizing the standard deviation such that the histogram of P values is as much as possible coincident with the null hypothesis results in an increase in the number and biological reliability of the selected genes. Our contribution was that we improved these methods so as to be able to select biologically more reasonable differentially expressed genes than the state of art methods that must empirically assume negative binomial distributions and dispersion relation, which is required for the selecting more expressed genes than less expressed ones, which can be achieved by the proposed methods that do not have to assume these.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.