Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36261395›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2022

Print-and-Grow within a Novel Support Material for 3D Bioprinting and Post-Printing Tissue Growth.

Majd Machour, Noy Hen, Idit Goldfracht, Dina Safina, Maya Davidovich-Pinhas, Havazelet Bianco-Peled, Shulamit Levenberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Diffusion-Based 3D Bioprinting Strategies.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Majd MachourDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, 32000, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-0813-9870
Noy HenDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, 32000, Israel.
Idit GoldfrachtDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, 32000, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-2575-2159
Dina SafinaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, 32000, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-9663-6163
Maya Davidovich-PinhasDepartment of Biotechnology and Food Engineering, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, 32000, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-0268-9943
Havazelet Bianco-PeledDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, 32000, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-7238-0207
Shulamit LevenbergDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, 32000, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-5471-7339

Funding

European Research Council 818808
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

3D bioprinting holds great promise for tissue engineering, with extrusion bioprinting in suspended hydrogels becoming the leading bioprinting technique in recent years. In this method, living cells are incorporated within bioinks, extruded layer by layer into a granular support material followed by gelation of the bioink through diverse cross-linking mechanisms. This approach offers high fidelity and precise fabrication of complex structures mimicking living tissue properties. However, the transition of cell mass mixed with the bioink into functional native-like tissue requires post-printing cultivation in vitro. An often-overlooked drawback of 3D bioprinting is the nonuniform shrinkage and deformation of printed constructs during the post-printing tissue maturation period, leading to highly variable engineered constructs with unpredictable size and shape. This limitation poses a challenge for the technology to meet applicative requirements. A novel technology of "print-and-grow," involving 3D bioprinting and subsequent cultivation in κ-Carrageenan-based microgels (CarGrow) for days is presented. CarGrow enhances the long-term structural stability of the printed objects by providing mechanical support. Moreover, this technology provides a possibility for live imaging to monitor tissue maturation. The "print-and-grow" method demonstrates accurate bioprinting with high tissue viability and functionality while preserving the construct's shape and size.

Indexed as

3D bioprintingbioinkcontractionsupport materialtissue engineeringκ-Carrageenan

Identifiers

PMID36261395
PMCPMC9731703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.