ArticleExperimental animals2023
Dynamics and observations of long-term orthodontic tooth movement and subsequent relapse in C57BL/6 mice.
Article in Experimental animals, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects ofJournal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2025Article
- Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes: a potential cell-free therapy for orthodontic tooth stability management.Stem cell research & therapy · 2024Review
- Role of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field on Alveolar Bone Remodeling during Orthodontic Retention Phase in Rat Models.Dentistry journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The risk of relapse associated with orthodontic treatment is a major problem. Despite extensive research and discussion regarding the risk of orthodontic relapse, the underlying mechanisms remain to be elucidated. This study aimed to evaluate relapse following orthodontic treatment in mice (C57BL/6) tested via the coil spring method based on tooth movement at 21 days and mechanical retention at 7 days after completion of the procedure. During the experiment, relapse was observed and evaluated over 7 days. At the end of orthodontic tooth movement, the average distance was 259.6 (± 10.9) µm, and tooth movement was observed in all mice. No significant differences in distance were observed at the end of the experimental treatment period or after 7 days of mechanical retention. The distance at the start of observation was 258.6 (± 10.4) µm, whereas that at the end was 155.4 (± 12.4) µm, indicating that the distance had decreased significantly. Relative to the total relapse distance over the 7-day period, 45.7 (± 4.3)% of the relapse was observed on Day 0-1. The mouse model established in the current study provides an effective and reproducible method for the optimal evaluation of relapse. Our findings clarified that most of the relapse occurs within 7 days during the initial observation stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.