Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36261313›Full record

ArticleJournal of microbiology, immunology, and infection = Wei mian yu gan ran za zhi2022

Evaluation of the T cell and B cell response following the administration of COVID-19 vaccines in Korea.

Kristin Widyasari, Jieun Jang, Seungjun Lee, Taejoon Kang, Sunjoo Kim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microbiology, immunology, and infection = Wei mian yu gan ran za zhi, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kristin WidyasariDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Changwon, 51472, South Korea.
Jieun JangGyeongnam Center for Infectious Disease Control and Prevention, Changwon 51154, South Korea.
Seungjun LeeDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Changwon, 51472, South Korea; Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, Gyeongsang Institute of Health Sciences, Jinju 52727, South Korea.
Taejoon KangBionanotechnology Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB), Daejeon 34141, South Korea; School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, 16419, South Korea.
Sunjoo KimDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Changwon, 51472, South Korea; Gyeongnam Center for Infectious Disease Control and Prevention, Changwon 51154, South Korea; Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, Gyeongsang Institute of Health Sciences, Jinju 52727, South Korea. Electronic address: sjkim8239@hanmail.net.
Changwon National University · KRKorea Center for Disease Control and Prevention · KRKorea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has been a worldwide concern since 2019. Vaccines are predicted to be crucial in preventing further outbreaks. The development and kinetics of immune responses determine the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines.

methodsWe measured interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) levels upon administering homologous adenovirus vector-based (ChAdOx1-S [AZ], Ad26.COV2.S [JAN]), mRNA-based (BNT162b2 [PF]; mRNA-1273 [MO]), and heterologous (AZ/PF) vaccines in healthy Korean individuals using two IFN-γ release assays: the Covi-FERON ELISA and T-SPOT Discovery SARS-CoV-2 assay. B cell responses were evaluated by assessing the production of neutralizing antibodies by surrogate virus neutralization assay. The immune response among the vaccine groups was compared after adjusting the vaccination dose and interactions between each group.

resultsAZ triggered the highest T cell response after the first dose but showed instability after the second. PF and MO yielded stable and higher increments of T and B cell responses compared to AZ. MO yielded a higher immune response than PF. JAN yielded T and B cell responses at lower levels than the other vaccines. The booster dose triggered significant increases in the T and B cell responses and is therefore needed to protect against SARS-CoV-2 given the possibility of waning immune responses.

conclusionAdministering two doses of mRNA vaccines provides the most effective results among the administered vaccines in triggering the immune response specific to SARS-CoV-2 in healthy Korean individuals. Administration of booster doses demonstrated a significant increase in the immune response and may provide longer protection against SARS-CoV-2.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAd26COVS1Antibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineHumansRepublic of KoreaSARS-CoV-2T-LymphocytesVaccinationAd26COVS1Antibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesBoosterCOVID-19Interferon-gamma (IFN-γ)Neutralizing antibodyVaccine

Identifiers

PMID36261313
PMCPMC9516877
OpenAlexW4297497204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.