Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36261278›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurointerventional surgery2023

Endovascular treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms using the Nautilus Intrasaccular System: initial case series of 41 patients at a single center.

Alexander Sirakov, Pervinder Bhogal, Kristina Sirakova, Marin Penkov, Krasimir Minkin, Kristian Ninov, Hristo Hristov, Asen Hadzhiyanev, Vasil Karakostov, Stanimir Sirakov

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurointerventional surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A review and journey in intrasaccular treatment of intracranial aneurysms.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexander SirakovRadiology Department, University Hospital St Ivan Rilski, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Pervinder BhogalInterventional Neuroradiology, The Royal Hospital, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5514-5237
Kristina SirakovaRadiology Department, University Hospital Alexandrovska, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Marin PenkovRadiology Department, University Hospital St Ivan Rilski, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Krasimir MinkinNeurosurgery Department, University Hospital St Ivan Rilski, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Kristian NinovNeurosurgery Department, University Hospital St Ivan Rilski, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Hristo HristovNeurosurgery Department, University Hospital St Ivan Rilski, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Asen HadzhiyanevNeurosurgery Department, University Hospital St Ivan Rilski, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Vasil KarakostovNeurosurgery Department, University Hospital St Ivan Rilski, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Stanimir SirakovRadiology Department, University Hospital St Ivan Rilski, Sofia, Bulgaria ssirakov@bsunivers.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6034-5340
University Hospital St. Ivan Rilski · BGAlexandrovska Hospital · BGUniversity of Ulster · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndovascular treatment of intracranial wide-necked and bifurcation aneurysms (WNBA) is technically challenging. The Nautilus Intrasaccular System is designed to provide a mechanical barrier at the aneurysm neck to support coil embolization. We report the results of a single-center series of patients treated for intracranial aneurysms with the Nautilus.

methodsClinical and radiological data were retrospectively collected for all patients treated with the Nautilus for an unruptured or ruptured intracranial aneurysm at our center between March 2021 and March 2022. Clinical outcomes (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores), Raymond-Roy angiographic occlusion, recanalization, and complications were measured immediately post-procedure and at 3-6-month follow-up.

resultsA total of 41 patients of mean age 56.7 years (range 37-83 years) were treated with the Nautilus, with 41 saccular aneurysms (18 (43.9%) unruptured and 23 (56.1%) ruptured). The majority of aneurysms (39/41 (95.1%)) were located in the anterior circulation. We experienced no technical complications. One patient had an asymptomatic post-procedural minor stroke related to the procedure. Immediate Class I occlusion was achieved in 30 (73.1%) patients. The rate of all-cause mortality was 7.3% (3/41). One patient was lost to follow-up. At follow-up, 94.5% (35/37) of patients achieved Class I occlusion and 94.5% (35/37) had an mRS score of 0. There were no procedural-related deaths or permanent morbidities at discharge or follow-up.

conclusionThis study demonstrates good safety and effectiveness using the Nautilus Intrasaccular System to treat both ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

Aneurysm, RupturedEmbolization, TherapeuticEndovascular ProceduresIntracranial AneurysmNautilusAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsCerebral AngiographyHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesStentsTreatment OutcomeAneurysmAngiographyArteryBrain

Identifiers

PMID36261278
PMCPMC10511998
OpenAlexW4306843897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.