Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36261235›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2022

Predictive value of tachycardia for mortality in trauma-related haemorrhagic shock: a systematic review and meta-regression.

Péter Jávor, Lilla Hanák, Péter Hegyi, Endre Csonka, Edina Butt, Tamara Horváth, István Góg, Anita Lukacs, Alexandra Soós, Zoltán Rumbus and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Péter JávorDepartment of Traumatology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-5628-9355
Lilla HanákInstitute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Péter HegyiInstitute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-0399-7259
Endre CsonkaDepartment of Traumatology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Edina ButtDepartment of Traumatology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Tamara HorváthInstitute of Surgical Research, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
István GógDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Hungarian Defense Forces Medical Center - Military Hospital, Budapest, Hungary.
Anita LukacsDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Neuroscience, Faculty of Science and Informatics, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Alexandra SoósInstitute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Zoltán RumbusDepartment of Thermophysiology, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Eszter PákaiDepartment of Thermophysiology, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
János ToldiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Petra HartmannDepartment of Traumatology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary hartmann.petra@med.u-szeged.hu.
University of Szeged · HUUniversity of Pecs · HUCenter for Translational Molecular Medicine · NLMilitary Hospital · PKSemmelweis University · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesHeart rate (HR) is one of the physiological variables in the early assessment of trauma-related haemorrhagic shock, according to Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS). However, its efficiency as predictor of mortality is contradicted by several studies. Furthermore, the linear association between HR and the severity of shock and blood loss presented by ATLS is doubtful. This systematic review aims to update current knowledge on the role of HR in the initial haemodynamic assessment of patients who had a trauma.

designThis study is a systematic review and meta-regression that follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses recommendations. DATA SOURCES: EMBASE, MEDLINE, CENTRAL and Web of Science databases were systematically searched through on 1 September 2020. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Papers providing early HR and mortality data on bleeding patients who had a trauma were included. Patient cohorts were considered haemorrhagic if the inclusion criteria of the studies contained transfusion and/or positive focused assessment with sonography for trauma and/or postinjury haemodynamical instability and/or abdominal gunshot injury. Studies on burns, traumatic spinal or brain injuries were excluded. Papers published before January 2010 were not considered. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data extraction and risk of bias were assessed by two independent investigators. The association between HR and mortality of patients who had a trauma was assessed using meta-regression analysis. As subgroup analysis, meta-regression was performed on patients who received blood products.

resultsFrom a total of 2017 papers, 19 studies met our eligibility criteria. Our primary meta-regression did not find a significant relation (p=0.847) between HR and mortality in patients who had a trauma with haemorrhage. Our subgroup analysis included 10 studies, and it could not reveal a linear association between HR and mortality rate.

conclusionsIn accordance with the literature demonstrating the multiphasic response of HR to bleeding, our study presents the lack of linear association between postinjury HR and mortality. Modifying the pattern of HR derangements in the ATLS shock classification may result in a more precise teaching tool for young clinicians.

Indexed as

Shock, HemorrhagicAdvanced Trauma Life Support CareHeart RateHemorrhageHumansTachycardiaACCIDENT & EMERGENCY MEDICINEBleeding disorders & coagulopathiesORTHOPAEDIC & TRAUMA SURGERYTrauma management

Identifiers

PMID36261235
PMCPMC9582324
OpenAlexW4306811785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.