ArticleSaudi medical journal2022
Prevalence of perianal diseases and associated factors in primigravida women: A hospital-based cross-sectional study.
Article in Saudi medical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo define the incidence of anorectal diseases in primigravida women as well as in the first month after delivery and the factors affecting the development of anorectal diseases.
methodsThe sample size was determined as 328 primigravida women. Research data were collected from pregnant women who applied to Gynecology and Obstetrics Polyclinic, Kars Harakani State Hospital Gynecology and General Surgery Polyclinic, Kafkas University, Kars, Turkey, between November 2020 and August 2021.The pregnant women were examined and surveyed 4 times; in the second and third trimesters, on the day after delivery, and in the first month after delivery. Chi-square test was used in the analysis of the data determined by counting. Variables which were statistically significant (
resultsPerianal disease was observed in 103 (38.6%) of the pregnant women. The incidence of perianal disease was found to be 4.917 times (confidence interval [CI]: [2.134-11.327]) higher in those with perianal disease compared with those without, 2.936 times (CI:[1.584-5.439]) higher in those who did not consume fiber-rich foods compared with those who did, 9.512 times (CI: [4.583-19.742]) higher in those with constipation compared with those without, and 23.721 times (CI: [5.363-104.915]) higher in those whose pushing stage duration was above average compared with that in those whose pushing stage duration was below average.
conclusionIn primigravida pregnants, the risk of perianal disease increases in those who have perianal disease before pregnancy, those who do not consume fibrous food, those who have constipation, and those who have a long pushing period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.