Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36261162›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2022

Effect of financial voucher incentives provided with UK stop smoking services on the cessation of smoking in pregnant women (CPIT III): pragmatic, multicentre, single blinded, phase 3, randomised controlled trial.

David Tappin, Lesley Sinclair, Frank Kee, Margaret McFadden, Lyn Robinson-Smith, Alex Mitchell, Ada Keding, Judith Watson, Sinead Watson, Alison Dick and 9 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Financial Incentives for Substance Abstinence: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Incentives for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Promoting healthy behaviour with financial incentives: three challenges and solutions for large scale implementation.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Moderate-to-late prematurity: understanding respiratory consequences and modifiable risk factors.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

David TappinChild Health, School of Medicine, Honorary Senior Research Fellow, University of Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8914-055X
Lesley SinclairYork Trials Unit, University of York, York, UK.
Frank KeeCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Margaret McFaddenNational Health Service Lanarkshire Clinical Trials Unit, Airdrie, UK.
Lyn Robinson-SmithYork Trials Unit, University of York, York, UK.
Alex MitchellYork Trials Unit, University of York, York, UK.
Ada KedingYork Trials Unit, University of York, York, UK.
Judith WatsonHealth Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Sinead WatsonCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Alison DickYork Trials Unit, University of York, York, UK.
David TorgersonYork Trials Unit, University of York, York, UK.
Catherine HewittYork Trials Unit, University of York, York, UK.
Jennifer McKellInstitute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Pat HoddinottNursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Fiona M HarrisSchool of Health and Life Sciences, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley, UK.
Kathleen A BoydHealth Economics and Health Technology Assessment, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9764-0113
Nicola McMeekinHealth Economics and Health Technology Assessment, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2918-8820
Michael UssherInstitute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Linda BauldUsher Institute and SPECTRUM Consortium, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 29792Chief Scientist Office HIPS/16/01Medical Research Council MR/S037519/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine effectiveness, cost effectiveness, generalisability, and acceptability of financial incentives for smoking cessation during pregnancy in addition to variously organised UK stop smoking services.

designPragmatic, multicentre, single blinded, phase 3, randomised controlled trial (Cessation in Pregnancy Incentives Trial phase 3 (CPIT III)).

settingSeven UK stop smoking services provided in primary and secondary care facilities in Scotland, Northern Ireland, and England.

participants944 pregnant women (age ≥16 years) who self-reported as being smokers (at least one cigarette in the past week) when asked at first maternity visit, less than 24 weeks' gestation, and notified to the trial team by routine stop smoking services.

interventionsParticipants in the control group were offered the standard stop smoking services, which includes the offer of counselling by specially trained workers using withdrawal orientated therapy and the offer of free nicotine replacement therapy. The intervention was the offer of usual support from the stop smoking services and the addition of up to £400 ($440; €455) of LoveToShop financial voucher incentives for engaging with current stop smoking services or to stop smoking, or both, during pregnancy.

main outcome measuresSelf-reported smoking cessation in late pregnancy (between 34 and 38 weeks' gestation) corroborated by saliva cotinine (and anabasine if using nicotine replacement products). Results were adjusted for age, smoking years, index of multiple deprivation, Fagerström score, before or after covid, and recruitment site. Secondary outcomes included point and continuous abstinence six months after expected date of delivery, engagement with stop smoking services, biochemically validated abstinence from smoking at four weeks after stop smoking date, birth weight of baby, cost effectiveness, generalisability documenting formats of stop smoking services, and acceptability to pregnant women and their carers.

resultsFrom 9 January 2018 to 4 April 2020, of 4032 women screened by stop smoking services, 944 people were randomly assigned to the intervention group (n=471) or the control group (n=470). Three people asked for their data to be removed. 126 (27%) of 471 participants stopped smoking from the intervention group and 58 (12%) of 470 from the control group (adjusted odds ratio 2.78 (1.94 to 3.97) P<0.001). Serious adverse events were miscarriages and other expected pregnancy events requiring hospital admission; all serious adverse events were unrelated to the intervention. Most people who stopped smoking from both groups relapsed after their baby was born.

conclusionsThe offer of up to £400 of financial voucher incentives to stop smoking during pregnancy as an addition to current UK stop smoking services is highly effective. This bolt-on intervention supports new guidance from the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, which includes the addition of financial incentives to support pregnant women to stop smoking. Continuing incentives to 12 months after birth is being examined to prevent relapse.

trial registrationISRCTN Registry ISRCTN15236311.

Indexed as

COVID-19Smoking CessationAdolescentAnabasineCotinineFemaleHumansMotivationPregnancyPregnant PeopleScotlandSmokingTobacco Use Cessation DevicesAnabasineCotinine

Identifiers

PMID36261162
PMCPMC9580214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.