Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36261127›Full record

ReviewArquivos de neuro-psiquiatria2022

The preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predictive value for survival in patients with brain metastasis.

Helder Picarelli, Vitor Nagai Yamaki, Davi Jorge Fontoura Solla, Iuri Santana Neville, Alexandra Gomes Dos Santos, Bruno Spindola Amaral Garcia de Freitas, Calvin Diep, Wellingson Silva Paiva, Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira, Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Helder PicarelliUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Neurologia, Divisão de Neurocirurgia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3387-4639
Vitor Nagai YamakiUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Neurologia, Divisão de Neurocirurgia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4872-1731
Davi Jorge Fontoura SollaUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Neurologia, Divisão de Neurocirurgia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5092-6595
Iuri Santana NevilleUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Neurologia, Divisão de Neurocirurgia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8561-9069
Alexandra Gomes Dos SantosUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Neurologia, Divisão de Neurocirurgia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5061-4551
Bruno Spindola Amaral Garcia de FreitasUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Neurologia, Divisão de Neurocirurgia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2673-5462
Calvin DiepUniversity of Toronto Medical School, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9596-5101
Wellingson Silva PaivaUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Neurologia, Divisão de Neurocirurgia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5165-7040
Manoel Jacobsen TeixeiraUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Neurologia, Divisão de Neurocirurgia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7974-6045
Eberval Gadelha FigueiredoUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Neurologia, Divisão de Neurocirurgia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9094-6622
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte (MLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and red blood cell distribution width (RDW) have been previously studied as predictors of survival in different malignancies.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of these hematologic inflammatory biomarkers for patients with brain metastases (BM).

methodsWe reviewed a consecutive cohort of patients at Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP-FMUSP) from 2011 to 2016 with ≥ 1 BM treated primarily by surgical resection. The primary outcome was 1-year survival. We optimized the NLR, MLR, PLR, and RDW cutoff values, preserving robustness and avoiding overestimation of effect size.

resultsA total of 200 patients (mean age 56.1 years; 55.0% female) met inclusion criteria. Gross-total resection was achieved in 89.0%. The median (quartiles) preoperative and postoperative KPS scores were 60 (50-80) and 80 (60-90), respectively. Preoperative NLR was significantly associated with survival (HR 2.66, 95% CI: 1.17-6.01,

conclusionsPreoperative NLR is an independent predictor of survival in newly diagnosed BM. We propose a cutoff value of 3.83 for preoperative NLR testing may be clinically useful as predictor of poor survival in this population. The wide accessibility of the NLR favors its inclusion in clinical decision-making processes for BM management.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsNeutrophilsBlood PlateletsBrazilFemaleHumansLymphocytesMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID36261127
PMCPMC9770070
OpenAlexW4301366176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.