Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36261052›Full record

SynthesisInternational wound journal2023

A cross-sector systematic review and synthesis of knowledge on telemedicine interventions in chronic wound management-Implications from a system perspective.

Sindre Aske Høyland, Kari Anne Holte, Kamrul Islam, Olaug Øygaarden, Egil Kjerstad, Synnøve Aske Høyland, Hanne Rusten Waernes, Marcus Gürgen, Katharina Brekke Conde, Kristin Søisdal Hovland and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International wound journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Sindre Aske HøylandDivision for Health and Social Sciences, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5291-415X
Kari Anne HolteDivision for Health and Social Sciences, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Stavanger, Norway.
Kamrul IslamDivision for Health and Social Sciences, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Stavanger, Norway.
Olaug ØygaardenDivision for Health and Social Sciences, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Stavanger, Norway.
Egil KjerstadDivision for Health and Social Sciences, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Stavanger, Norway.
Synnøve Aske HøylandDepartment for Dermatology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Hanne Rusten WaernesDepartment for Dermatology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Marcus GürgenDepartment for Dermatology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Katharina Brekke CondeDepartment for Dermatology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Kristin Søisdal HovlandDepartment for Dermatology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Eirin RødsethDepartment for Personal E-Health, Norwegian Centre for E-health Research, Tromsø, Norway.
Pascale CarayonDepartment for Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Maureen FallonWelsh Wound Innovation Centre WWIC, Ynysmaerdy, Wales.
Nicola IvinsWelsh Wound Innovation Centre WWIC, Ynysmaerdy, Wales.
Sarah BradburyWelsh Wound Innovation Centre WWIC, Ynysmaerdy, Wales.
Sissel Iren Eikeland HusebøDepartment for Dermatology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Keith G HardingSchool of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Thomas TernowitzDepartment for Dermatology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Stavanger University Hospital · NONORCE Research AS · NOWelsh Government · GBMount Elizabeth Novena Hospital · SGUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USUniversity of Wisconsin System · US

Funding

Norges Forskningsråd 326574
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Based on initially identified needs for further telemedicine (TM) and chronic wound management research, the objective of this article is twofold: to conduct a systematic review of existing knowledge on TM interventions in chronic wound management-including barriers and opportunities-across the specialist and primary care sectors, and to incorporate the review findings into a system framework that can be further developed and validated through empirical data. We conclude that there is a pressing need for broader and more comprehensive empirical explorations into quality improvement and integration of TM in chronic wound management, including using system frameworks that can capture cross-sector system perspectives and associated implications. Of practical consideration, we suggest that the design and execution of TM improvement interventions and associated research projects should be conducted in close cooperation with managers and practitioners knowledgeable about barriers and opportunities that can influence the implementation of important interventions within chronic wound management.

Indexed as

TelemedicineWounds and InjuriesHumanschronic wound managementsystematic reviewsystem frameworktelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID36261052
PMCPMC10088836
OpenAlexW4306828748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.