ArticleBlood advances2023
Evaluation of 4 prognostic indices in follicular lymphoma treated in first line with immunochemotherapy.
Article in Blood advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Guidelines for Diagnosis, Treatment, and Follow-Up of Patients with Follicular Lymphoma-Spanish Lymphoma Group (GELTAMO) 2025.Cancers · 2026Guideline
- Molecular Biomarkers in Prediction of High-Grade Transformation and Outcome in Patients with Follicular Lymphoma: A Comprehensive Systemic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Pooled it
- Consensus recommendations from the 2024 International Follicular Lymphoma Scientific Workshop.Blood advances · 2026Review
- Article
- Early prognostic stratification of follicular lymphoma through ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT tumor metabolic parameters and clinical characteristics.EJNMMI research · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a gene expression signature to predict early events in patients with follicular lymphoma.Blood advances · 2025Article
- Follicular Lymphoma: Current Therapeutic Landscape and Future Prospects.Hematological oncology · 2025Review
- Integration of PET/CT parameters and a clinical variable to predict the risk of progression of disease within 24 months (POD24) in follicular lymphoma.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Effect of POD24 on the prognosis of follicular and other indolent B-cell non-hodgkin lymphomas.Annals of hematology · 2025Review
- Personalised therapy in follicular lymphoma - is the dial turning?Hematological oncology · 2024Review
- High Ki-67 Expression Predicting a Risk Factor for the Progression of Disease within 24 Months and Microenvironment in Follicular Lymphoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Follicular Lymphoma in Chile in the Adult Public Cancer Program: The Impact of Chemoimmunotherapy.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several clinical risk models have been proposed to predict the outcome of follicular lymphoma (FL). The development of next-generation sequencing technologies has allowed the integration of somatic gene mutations into clinical scores to build genotyped-based risk models, such as the m7-Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI). We explored 4 clinical or clinicogenetic-risk models in patients with symptomatic FL who received frontline immunochemotherapy. Of 191 patients with FL grades 1 to 3a, 109 were successfully genotyped. The treatment consisted of rituximab (R) plus cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CVP)/cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) (72.5%) or R-bendamustine (R-B) (27.5%). The proportion of cases classified as high risk for FLIPI, FLIPI-2, PRIMA-prognostic index, or m7-FLIPI were 39.3%, 14%, 30.3%, and 22%, respectively. No case with low-intermediate FLIPI was upgraded in the m7-FLIPI, but 18 of the 42 high-risk patients with FLIPI were downgraded to low-risk m7-FLIPI. The sensitivity and specificity for the prediction of POD24 were highest for FLIPI. The discrimination between progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was the best for FLIPI (c-index: 0.644 and 0.727, respectively). When analyzed only in patients treated with R-B, m7-FLIPI showed a higher discrimination between PFS and OS. Thus, the FLIPI remains the clinical risk score with higher discrimination in patients with advanced FL treated with immunochemotherapy; however, the performance of the m7-FLIPI should be further investigated in patients treated with R-B.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.