Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36260705›Full record

SynthesisMedical care2022

A Systematic Review of Strategies to Enhance Response Rates and Representativeness of Patient Experience Surveys.

Rebecca Anhang Price, Denise D Quigley, J Lee Hargraves, Joann Sorra, Alejandro U Becerra-Ornelas, Ron D Hays, Paul D Cleary, Julie Brown, Marc N Elliott

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medical care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
17.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Multilevel factors associated with nonresponse to patient-reported outcome measures in routine radiation oncology care.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  8. Evaluation of the Community Urgent Eyecare Service in Greater Manchester, Including the Impact of Independent Prescribing.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The semantic differential questionnaire format warrants consideration for use in healthcare settings.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca Anhang PriceRAND Corporation, Arlington, VA.
Denise D QuigleyRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
J Lee HargravesCenter for Survey Research, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA.
Joann SorraWestat, Rockville, MD.
Alejandro U Becerra-OrnelasRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
Ron D HaysDavid Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.
Paul D ClearyYale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT.
Julie BrownRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
Marc N ElliottRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
RAND Corporation · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Massachusetts Boston · USWestat (United States) · USYale University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems V (CAHPS V)U18HS025920 · AHRQ · RAND CORPORATION · PI HAYS, RONALD DALE · 2017 to 2021
$5.6M
AHRQ HHS U18 HS025920NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData from surveys of patient care experiences are a cornerstone of public reporting and pay-for-performance initiatives. Recently, increasing concerns have been raised about survey response rates and how to promote equity by ensuring that responses represent the perspectives of all patients.

objectiveReview evidence on survey administration strategies to improve response rates and representativeness of patient surveys. RESEARCH

designSystematic review adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. STUDY SELECTION: Forty peer-reviewed randomized experiments of administration protocols for patient experience surveys.

resultsMail administration with telephone follow-up provides a median response rate benefit of 13% compared with mail-only or telephone-only. While surveys administered only by web typically result in lower response rates than those administered by mail or telephone (median difference in response rate: -21%, range: -44%, 0%), the limited evidence for a sequential web-mail-telephone mode suggests a potential response rate benefit over sequential mail-telephone (median: 4%, range: 2%, 5%). Telephone-only and sequential mixed modes including telephone may yield better representation across patient subgroups by age, insurance type, and race/ethnicity. Monetary incentives are associated with large increases in response rates (median increase: 12%, range: 7%, 20%).

conclusionsSequential mixed-mode administration yields higher patient survey response rates than a single mode. Including telephone in sequential mixed-mode administration improves response among those with historically lower response rates; including web in mixed-mode administration may increase response at lower cost. Other promising strategies to improve response rates include in-person survey administration during hospital discharge, incentives, minimizing survey language complexity, and prenotification before survey administration.

Indexed as

Postal ServiceReimbursement, IncentiveHumansPatient Outcome AssessmentSurveys and QuestionnairesTelephone

Identifiers

PMID36260705
PMCPMC9645551
OpenAlexW4306834032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.