Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36260638›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

No fry zones: How restaurant distribution and abundance influence avian communities in the Phoenix, AZ metropolitan area.

Jeffrey A Brown, Susannah B Lerman, Anthony J Basile, Heather L Bateman, Pierre Deviche, Paige S Warren, Karen L Sweazea

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Coyote (Ecology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jeffrey A BrownGlobal Institute of Sustainability, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States of America.
Susannah B LermanUSDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Amherst, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Anthony J BasileSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5742-7468
Heather L BatemanCollege of Integrative Sciences and Arts, Arizona State University, Mesa, AZ, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3573-3824
Pierre DevicheSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States of America.
Paige S WarrenDepartment of Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Karen L SweazeaSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0345-4086

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urbanization is one of the most widespread and extreme examples of habitat alteration. As humans dominate landscapes, they introduce novel elements into environments, including artificial light, noise pollution, and anthropogenic food sources. One understudied form of anthropogenic food is refuse from restaurants, which can alter wildlife populations and, in turn, entire wildlife communities by providing a novel and stable food source. Using data from the Maricopa Association of Governments and the Central Arizona-Phoenix Long Term Ecological Research (CAP LTER) project, we investigated whether and how the distribution of restaurants influences avian communities. The research aimed to identify restaurants, and thus the associated food they may provide, as the driver of potential patterns by controlling for other influences of urbanization, including land cover and the total number of businesses. Using generalized linear mixed models, we tested whether the number of restaurants within 1 km of bird monitoring locations predict avian community richness and abundance and individual species abundance and occurrence patterns. Results indicate that restaurants may decrease avian species diversity and increase overall abundance. Additionally, restaurants may be a significant predictor of the overall abundance of urban-exploiting species, including rock pigeon (Columba livia), mourning dove (Zenaida macroura), and Inca dove (Columbina Inca). Understanding how birds utilize anthropogenic food sources can inform possible conservation or wildlife management practices. As this study highlights only correlations, we suggest further experimental work to address the physiological ramifications of consuming anthropogenic foods provided by restaurants and studies to quantify how frequently anthropogenic food sources are used compared to naturally occurring sources.

Indexed as

ColumbidaeRestaurantsAnimalsArizonaEcosystemHumansUrbanization

Identifiers

PMID36260638
PMCPMC9581420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.