Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36260627›Full record

Trial reportPLoS medicine2022

Favipiravir, lopinavir-ritonavir, or combination therapy (FLARE): A randomised, double-blind, 2 × 2 factorial placebo-controlled trial of early antiviral therapy in COVID-19.

David M Lowe, Li-An K Brown, Kashfia Chowdhury, Stephanie Davey, Philip Yee, Felicia Ikeji, Amalia Ndoutoumou, Divya Shah, Alexander Lennon, Abhulya Rai and 8 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04499677 (Favipiravir, Lopinavir/Ritonavir or Combination Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04499677 phase2completednot on this map

Favipiravir, Lopinavir/Ritonavir or Combination Therapy: a Randomised, Double Blind, 2x2 Factorial Placebo-controlled Trial of Early Antiviral Therapy in COVID-19

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity College, LondonRan2020 to 2022Enrolled240ConditionsCOVID-19ArmsFavipiravir, Lopinavir/ Ritonavir, Favipiravir Placebo, Lopinavir/ Ritonavir Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Favipiravir for treating COVID-19.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. The efficacy and adverse effects of favipiravir on patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of published clinical trials and observational studies.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. COVID-19 therapeutics.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Aprotinin-Drug against Respiratory Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Favipiravir-Tautomeric and Complexation Properties in Solution.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

David M LoweInstitute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6102-2375
Li-An K BrownInstitute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8261-0288
Kashfia ChowdhuryComprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8185-5152
Stephanie DaveyDepartment of Rheumatology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9479-6473
Philip YeeDepartment of Rheumatology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3426-9257
Felicia IkejiComprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Amalia NdoutoumouComprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0982-1222
Divya ShahDepartment of Virology, Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7190-8257
Alexander LennonDepartment of Virology, Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3363-0637
Abhulya RaiDepartment of Virology, Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9464-7013
Akosua A AgyemanInfection, Immunity and Inflammation Research and Teaching Department, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Anna CheckleyUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Nicola LongleyUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Hakim-Moulay DehbiComprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0816-0178
Nick FreemantleComprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5807-5740
Judith BreuerDepartment of Virology, Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4792-5903
Joseph F StandingInfection, Immunity and Inflammation Research and Teaching Department, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4561-7173
FLARE Investigators
University College London · GBGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust · GBRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M008665/Medical Research Council MR/M008665/1Medical Research Council MR/W015560/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly antiviral treatment is effective for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) but currently available agents are expensive. Favipiravir is routinely used in many countries, but efficacy is unproven. Antiviral combinations have not been systematically studied. We aimed to evaluate the effect of favipiravir, lopinavir-ritonavir or the combination of both agents on Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viral load trajectory when administered early. METHODS AND

findingsWe conducted a Phase 2, proof of principle, randomised, placebo-controlled, 2 × 2 factorial, double-blind trial of ambulatory outpatients with early COVID-19 (within 7 days of symptom onset) at 2 sites in the United Kingdom. Participants were randomised using a centralised online process to receive: favipiravir (1,800 mg twice daily on Day 1 followed by 400 mg 4 times daily on Days 2 to 7) plus lopinavir-ritonavir (400 mg/100 mg twice daily on Day 1, followed by 200 mg/50 mg 4 times daily on Days 2 to 7), favipiravir plus lopinavir-ritonavir placebo, lopinavir-ritonavir plus favipiravir placebo, or both placebos. The primary outcome was SARS-CoV-2 viral load at Day 5, accounting for baseline viral load. Between 6 October 2020 and 4 November 2021, we recruited 240 participants. For the favipiravir+lopinavir-ritonavir, favipiravir+placebo, lopinavir-ritonavir+placebo, and placebo-only arms, we recruited 61, 59, 60, and 60 participants and analysed 55, 56, 55, and 58 participants, respectively, who provided viral load measures at Day 1 and Day 5. In the primary analysis, the mean viral load in the favipiravir+placebo arm had changed by -0.57 log10 (95% CI -1.21 to 0.07, p = 0.08) and in the lopinavir-ritonavir+placebo arm by -0.18 log10 (95% CI -0.82 to 0.46, p = 0.58) compared to the placebo arm at Day 5. There was no significant interaction between favipiravir and lopinavir-ritonavir (interaction coefficient term: 0.59 log10, 95% CI -0.32 to 1.50, p = 0.20). More participants had undetectable virus at Day 5 in the favipiravir+placebo arm compared to placebo only (46.3% versus 26.9%, odds ratio (OR): 2.47, 95% CI 1.08 to 5.65; p = 0.03). Adverse events were observed more frequently with lopinavir-ritonavir, mainly gastrointestinal disturbance. Favipiravir drug levels were lower in the combination arm than the favipiravir monotherapy arm, possibly due to poor absorption. The major limitation was that the study population was relatively young and healthy compared to those most affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.

conclusionsAt the current doses, no treatment significantly reduced viral load in the primary analysis. Favipiravir requires further evaluation with consideration of dose escalation. Lopinavir-ritonavir administration was associated with lower plasma favipiravir concentrations.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT04499677 EudraCT: 2020-002106-68.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentAmidesAntiviral AgentsHumansLopinavirPandemicsPyrazinesRitonavirSARS-CoV-2Treatment OutcomeAmidesAntiviral AgentsfavipiravirLopinavirPyrazinesRitonavir

Identifiers

PMID36260627
PMCPMC9629589
OpenAlexW4306833526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.