Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36260593›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2023

Simultaneous Assessment of the Whole Eye Biomechanics Using Ultrasonic Elastography.

Runze Li, Xuejun Qian, Chen Gong, Junhang Zhang, Ying Liu, Benjamin Xu, Mark S Humayun, Qifa Zhou

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Phantoms for use in optical coherence elastography.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Corneal biomechanics and diagnostics: a review.International ophthalmology · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Runze Li
Xuejun Qian
Chen Gong
Junhang Zhang
Ying Liu
Benjamin Xu
Mark S Humayun
Qifa Zhou
University of Southern California · US

Funding

Ophthalmic Therapeutics Engineering CoreP30EY029220 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Mahnaz Shahidi · 2018 to 2026
$6.5M
High-resolution Elastographic Assessment of the Optic Nerve HeadR01EY028662 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI CHEN, ZHONGPING, SIGAL, IAN A · 2018 to 2021
$2.7M
Biomechanical mapping of the optic nerve head and peripapillary sclera using high frequency ultrasonic elastographyR01EY032229 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI ZHOU, QIFA · 2021 to 2024
$2.6M
High Resolution Elastograpy of Retina Under Prosthetic Electrical StimulationR01EY026091 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI CHEN, ZHONGPING, ZHOU, QIFA · 2016 to 2019
$2.0M
Non-invasive Ultrasound Stimulated Retinal ProsthesisR01EY030126 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI ZHOU, QIFA · 2019 to 2022
$2.0M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY029220NEI NIH HHS R01 EY026091NEI NIH HHS R01 EY028662NEI NIH HHS R01 EY030126NEI NIH HHS R01 EY032229
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCurrent elastography techniques in the field of ophthalmology usually target one specific tissue, such as the cornea or the sclera. However, the eye is an inter-related organ, and some ocular diseases can alter the biomechanical properties of multiple anatomical structures. Hence, there is a need to develop an imaging tool that can non-invasively, quantitatively, and accurately characterize dynamic changes among these biomechanical properties.

methodsA high resolution ultrasound elastography system was developed to achieve this goal. The efficacy and accuracy of the system was first validated on tissue-mimicking phantoms while mechanical testing measurements served as the gold standard. Next, an in vivo elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) model was established in rabbits to further test our system. In particular, elastography measurements were obtained at 5 IOP levels, ranging from 10 mmHg to 30 mmHg in 5 mmHg increments. Spatial-temporal maps of the multiple ocular tissues (cornea, lens, iris, optic nerve head, and peripapillary sclera) were obtained.

resultsThe spatial-temporal maps were acquired simultaneously for the ocular tissues at the 5 different IOP levels. The statistical analysis of the elastic wave speed was presented for ocular tissues. Finally, the mapping for the elastic wave speed of each ocular component was acquired at each IOP level.

conclusionOur elastography system can concurrently assess the biomechanical properties of multiple ocular structures and detect changes in biomechanical properties associated with changes in IOP. SIGNIFICANCE: This system provides a novel tool to measure and quantify the biomechanical properties of the whole eye.

Indexed as

Elasticity Imaging TechniquesUltrasonicsAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCorneaRabbitsSound

Identifiers

PMID36260593
PMCPMC10365545
OpenAlexW4306830936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.