Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36260556›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Are synchronous chats a silver lining of emergency remote instruction? Text-based chatting is disproportionately favored by women in a non-majors introductory biology course.

Rachael D Robnett, Cissy J Ballen, Sheritta Fagbodun, Kelly Lane, Sophie J McCoy, Lecia Robinson, Ebony I Weems, Sehoya Cotner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rachael D RobnettDepartment of Psychology, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, United States of America.
Cissy J BallenDepartment of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States of America.
Sheritta FagbodunDepartment of Biology, Tuskegee University, Tuskegee, AL, United States of America.
Kelly LaneDepartment of Biology Teaching and Learning, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America.
Sophie J McCoyDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States of America.
Lecia RobinsonDepartment of Biology, Tuskegee University, Tuskegee, AL, United States of America.
Ebony I WeemsDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Alabama Agricultural and Mechanical University, Huntsville, AL, United States of America.
Sehoya CotnerDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Bergen (Norway), Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-3324-9430

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a reimagining of many aspects of higher education, including how instructors interact with their students and how they encourage student participation. Text-based chatting during synchronous remote instruction is a simple form of student-student and student-instructor interaction. The importance of student participation has been documented, as have clear disparities in participation between those well-represented and those under-represented in science disciplines. Thus, we conducted an investigation into who is texting, what students are texting, and how these texts align with course content. We focused on two sections of a large-enrollment, introductory biology class offered remotely during Fall 2020. Using an analysis of in-class chatting, in combination with student survey responses, we find that text-based chatting suggests not only a high level of student engagement, but a type of participation that is disproportionately favored by women. Given the multiple lines of evidence indicating that women typically under-participate in their science courses, any vehicle that counters this trend merits further exploration. We conclude with suggestions for further research, and ideas for carrying forward text-based chatting in the post-COVID-19, in-person classroom.

Indexed as

COVID-19Text MessagingBiologyFemaleHumansStudents

Identifiers

PMID36260556
PMCPMC9581347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.