Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36260487›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of sports medicine2022

Performance of 5-Strand Hamstring Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the STABILITY Study: A Subgroup Analysis.

Parth Lodhia, Goris Nazari, Dianne Bryant, Alan Getgood, Robert McCormack, STABILITY Group, Alan M J Getgood, Dianne M Bryant, Robert Litchfield, Kevin Willits and 70 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of sports medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Golfers have greater preoperative and equal postoperative function when undergoing total knee arthroplasty compared to non-golfers.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

80 authors.

Parth LodhiaUniversity of British Columbia, New Westminster, Canada.
Goris NazariCanadian Institutes of Health Research, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Dianne BryantThe University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Alan GetgoodWestern Ontario University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Robert McCormackUniversity of British Columbia, New Westminster, Canada.
STABILITY Group
Alan M J Getgood
Dianne M Bryant
Robert Litchfield
Kevin Willits
Trevor Birmingham
Chris Hewison
Andrew D Firth
Stacey Wanlin
Ryan Pinto
Ashley Martindale
Lindsey O'Neill
Morgan Jennings
Michal DanilukLondon Health Sciences Centre, Western University, Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic, London, Canada.
Robert G McCormack
Dory Boyer
Mauri Zomar
Karyn Moon
Raely Moon
Brenda Fan
Bindu Mohan
Kyrsten PayneFraser Orthopaedic Institute, New Westminster, Canada.
Mark Heard
Gregory M Buchko
Laurie A Hiemstra
Sarah Kerslake
Jeremy TynedalBanff Sport Medicine, Banff, Canada.
Peter B MacDonald
Greg Stranges
Sheila Mcrae
LeeAnne Gullett
Holly Brown
Alexandra Legary
Alison Longo
Mat Christian
Celeste FergusonPan Am Clinic, Winnipeg, Canada.
Alex Rezansoff
Nick Mohtadi
Rhamona Barber
Denise Chan
Caitlin Campbell
Alexandra Garven
Karen Pulsifer
Michelle MayerSport Medicine Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Devin Peterson
Nicole Simunovic
Andrew Duong
David Robinson
David Levy
Matt Skelly
Ajaykumar ShanmugarajMcMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Davide Bardana
Fiona Howells
Murray ToughQueens University, Kingston, Canada.
Tim Spalding
Pete Thompson
Andrew Metcalfe
Laura Asplin
Alisen Dube
Louise Clarkson
Jaclyn Brown
Alison Bolsover
Carolyn Bradshaw
Larissa Belgrove
Francis Milan
Sylvia Turner
Sarah Verdugo
Janet Lowe
Debra Dunne
Kerri McGowan
Charlie-Marie SuddensUniversity Hospitals Coventry Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.
Peter C M Verdonk
Geert Declerq
Kristien Vuylsteke
Mieke Van HaverAntwerp Orthopaedic Center, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions (ACLRs) with graft diameters <8mm have been shown to have higher revision rates. The 5-strand (5S) hamstring autograft configuration is a proposed option to increase graft diameter. PURPOSE: To investigate the differences in clinical outcomes between 4-strand (4S) and 5S hamstring autografts for ACLR in patients who underwent ACLR alone or concomitantly with a lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) procedure. STUDY

designCohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

methodsData from the STABILITY study were analyzed to compare a subgroup of patients undergoing ACLR alone or with a concomitant LET procedure (ACLR + LET) with a minimum graft diameter of 8mm that had either a 4S or 5S hamstring autograft configuration. The primary outcome was clinical failure, a composite of rotatory laxity and/or graft failure. The secondary outcome measures consisted of 2 patient-reported outcome scores (PROs)-namely, the ACL Quality of Life Questionnaire (ACL-QoL) and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score at 24 months postoperatively.

resultsOf the 618 patients randomized in the STABILITY study, 399 (228 male; 57%) fit the inclusion criteria for this study. Of these, 191 and 208 patients underwent 4S and 5S configurations of hamstring ACLR, respectively, with a minimum graft diameter of 8mm. Both groups had similar characteristics other than differences in anthropometric factors-namely, sex, height, and weight, and Beighton scores. The primary outcomes revealed no difference between the 2 groups in rotatory stability (odds ratio [OR], 1.19; 95% CI, 0.77-1.84;

conclusionAt the 24-month follow-up, there were no significant differences in clinical failure rates and PROs in an analysis of patients with 4S and 5S hamstring autografts of ≥8mm diameter for ACLR or ACLR + LET. The 5S hamstring graft configuration is a viable option to produce larger-diameter ACL grafts.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionHamstring TendonsAutograftsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansKnee JointMaleQuality of LifeTransplantation, Autologous4-strand hamstring autograft5-strand hamstring autograftanterior cruciate ligament reconstructionlateral extra-articular tenodesis

Identifiers

PMID36260487
PMCPMC9630854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.